XPost: alt.atheism, alt.talk.creationism, sci.skeptic   
   XPost: alt.philosophy   
   From: sylvia@not.at.this.address   
      
   On 4/06/2016 12:29 PM, mur@. wrote:   
   > On Tue, 31 May 2016 13:53:10 +1000, Sylvia Else    
   > wrote:   
   >   
   >> On 31/05/2016 1:45 PM, mur@. wrote:   
   >>> On Mon, 30 May 2016 12:12:50 +1000, Sylvia Else    
   >>> wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>> On 30/05/2016 3:34 AM, Dale wrote:   
   >>>>> Affirming the consequent   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Affirming_the_consequent   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> if an atheistic cosmos then some atheistic parts   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> some atheistic parts   
   >>>>> an atheistic cosmos   
   >>>>   
   >>>>> applies to a recent discussion where a poster said abiogenesis (life   
   >>>>> from non-life) "had" to happen, whereas we have never observed it and   
   >>>>> observe biogenesis (life from life)   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Or you simply misconstrued the posting. If you'd give specifics, we   
   >>>> could form a judgement. At the moment, you're asking us to take your   
   >>>> conclusion on trust. Now there's a familiar feeling - what does it   
   >>>> remind me of?   
   >>>   
   >>>       Strong atheism is the most faith or conclusion on trust based   
   religious   
   >>> belief of all, since there could never be any evidence to support it.   
   >>>   
   >>   
   >> What has that to do with this thread?   
   >   
   >      Can't you think of anything it has to do with it?   
   >   
      
   Nup.   
      
   Sylvia.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)