XPost: alt.atheism, alt.talk.creationism   
   From: Dean"@gmail.com   
      
   On 11/13/2016 8:31 AM, Christopher A. Lee wrote:   
   > On Sun, 13 Nov 2016 02:40:53 -0500, "R. Dean" <"R. Dean"@gmail.com>   
   > wrote:   
   >   
   >> On 11/8/2016 11:45 PM, mur@. wrote:   
   >>   
   >>> Try to explain WHAT type of evidence you think there should be, WHERE you   
   think   
   >>> it should be, WHY you think it should be available to humans, and WHEN you   
   think   
   >>> it should have been or should be made available, if there truly is a God   
   >>> associated with this planet.   
   >>>   
   >> There is evidence available, how this evidence is interpreted   
   >   
   > Why do you keep repeating this lie which has been repeatedly debunked?   
    >   
   It's been challenged by several scenarios: including denial, ignoring   
   the evidence, the multiverse hypothesis, Adan's thiking mud puddle   
   bubble universes etc, but never debunked.   
   >   
   > Just saying something is evidence, doesn't make it so. You have to   
   > defend it as such - which you have only been able  to do in your own   
   > mind.   
   >   
   Whether the universe was fine tuned by some intelligient agency or   
   by random natural events, the universe is fine tuned for life, if   
   it were not we would not be here.   
      
   BTW did you check the references I provided? If so what is your   
   criticism, if not, why are you entitled to an opinion?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)