XPost: alt.talk.creationism, alt.atheism   
   From: Barry@saymyname.com   
      
   On Wed, 16 Nov 2016 07:42:45 +0100, Melzzzzz  wrote:   
      
   >On Wed, 16 Nov 2016 16:52:11 +1100   
   >Lucifer Morningstar  wrote:   
   >   
   >> On Tue, 15 Nov 2016 22:31:22 -0500, "R. Dean" <"R. Dean"@gmail.com>   
   >> wrote:   
   >>   
   >> >On 15/11/2016 8:01 PM, Lucifer Morningstar wrote:   
   >> >> On Tue, 15 Nov 2016 18:02:19 -0600, Christopher A. Lee   
   >> >>  wrote:   
   >> >>   
   >> >>> On Wed, 16 Nov 2016 09:34:36 +1100, Lucifer Morningstar   
   >> >>>  wrote:   
   >> >>>   
   >> >>>> On Tue, 15 Nov 2016 13:18:04 -0500, "R. Dean" <"R.   
   >> >>>> Dean"@gmail.com> wrote:   
   >> >>>>   
   >> >>>>> There is some theatrical basis for the multiverse found   
   >> >>>>> in the expansion of the  universe.   
   >> >>>>> Also in the interpretation of quantium  mechanics. But   
   >> >>>>> there is no direct empirical evidence for other universes.   
   >> >>>>   
   >> >>>> That's true. The multiverse idea was made up by someone   
   >> >>>> who wants an explanation and who has no concept of science.   
   >> >>>   
   >> >>> Bollocks.   
   >> >>   
   >> >> That's what the multiverse is. Pure made up nonsense.   
   >> >>   
   >> >Okay, but who or what group made up the multiverse nonsense?   
   >>   
   >> I don't know but it should be recorded somewhere.   
   >> The multiverse idea was made up by someone desperate for   
   >> an answer. It has no scientific basis.   
   >> Black holes went from being a crazy idea to being 'fact'   
   >> without any being discovered.   
   >   
   >What about supposed pictures of black holes? Science is sure they are   
   >there...   
      
   That's my point. Some scientists believe black holes exist even   
   though none have been detected.   
      
   >> The Big Bang theory seems   
   >> to have been accepted as fact without being proven.   
   >>   
   >   
   >Big Bang theory is based on observation.   
      
   BB ia based on interpretation. Nobody observed BB.   
      
   >Also flat standing still Earth   
   >from Bible is based on observation. What you see is what you think it   
   >is. But be prepared for radical changes as instruments of observation   
   >get more advanced ;)   
      
   BB theory makes assumptions that are not valid.   
      
   --   
   I call shenanigans on all theistic religions   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)