XPost: alt.talk.creationism, alt.atheism   
   From: Dean"@gmail.com   
      
   On 11/16/2016 11:49 PM, Christopher A. Lee wrote:   
   > On Wed, 16 Nov 2016 22:46:28 -0500, "R. Dean" <"R. Dean"@gmail.com>   
   > wrote:   
   >   
   >> On 11/16/2016 6:48 AM, Christopher A. Lee wrote:   
   >>> On Wed, 16 Nov 2016 07:42:45 +0100, Melzzzzz  wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>> On Wed, 16 Nov 2016 16:52:11 +1100   
   >>>> Lucifer Morningstar  wrote:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>> On Tue, 15 Nov 2016 22:31:22 -0500, "R. Dean" <"R. Dean"@gmail.com>   
   >>>>> wrote:   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>> On 15/11/2016 8:01 PM, Lucifer Morningstar wrote:   
   >>>>>>> On Tue, 15 Nov 2016 18:02:19 -0600, Christopher A. Lee   
   >>>>>>>  wrote:   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> On Wed, 16 Nov 2016 09:34:36 +1100, Lucifer Morningstar   
   >>>>>>>>  wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> On Tue, 15 Nov 2016 13:18:04 -0500, "R. Dean" <"R.   
   >>>>>>>>> Dean"@gmail.com> wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> There is some theatrical basis for the multiverse found   
   >>>>>>>>>> in the expansion of the  universe.   
   >>>>>>>>>> Also in the interpretation of quantium  mechanics. But   
   >>>>>>>>>> there is no direct empirical evidence for other universes.   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> That's true. The multiverse idea was made up by someone   
   >>>>>>>>> who wants an explanation and who has no concept of science.   
   >>>   
   >>> Tell that to the ghost of Erwin Schrodinger. Best known for his cat   
   >>> thought experiment but a Nobel Prize winning quantum physicist.   
   >>>   
   >>>>>>>> Bollocks.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> That's what the multiverse is. Pure made up nonsense.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>> Okay, but who or what group made up the multiverse nonsense?   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> I don't know but it should be recorded somewhere.   
   >>>>> The multiverse idea was made up by someone desperate for   
   >>>>> an answer. It has no scientific basis.   
   >>>   
   >>> It was proposed by Schrodinger and subsequently taken up by other   
   >>> astrophysicists and cosmologists, It is hypothetical, and a possible   
   >>> answer to whatever the big bang occurred "in" - remember that it was   
   >>> the origin of space and time as well as matter and energy (from our   
   >>> frame of reference).   
   >>>   
   >>> So in what frame of reference did it happen? This is just one of the   
   >>> many hypothesis.   
   >>>   
   >>> But unlike some imaginary designer for which there is no evidence   
   >>> because there is no way to determine design , nobody insists it   
   >>> actually happened that way.   
   >>>   
   >>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multiverse   
   >>>   
   >>>>> Black holes went from being a crazy idea to being 'fact'   
   >>>>> without any being discovered.   
   >>>   
   >>> More bollocks.   
   >>>   
   >>>> What about supposed pictures of black holes? Science is sure they are   
   >>>> there...   
   >>>   
   >>> Predicted as a consequence of general relativity. Detected by   
   >>> gravitational lensing, by objects going out  of sight as they orbit   
   >>> them and also by gravity waves (2015).   
   >>>   
   >>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_hole#Observational_evidence   
   >>>   
   >>>> The Big Bang theory seems   
   >>>>> to have been accepted as fact without being proven.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Big Bang theory is based on observation. Also flat standing still Earth   
   >>> >from Bible is based on observation. What you see is what you think it   
   >>>> is. But be prepared for radical changes as instruments of observation   
   >>>> get more advanced ;)   
   >>>   
   >>> The big bang was proposed as a consequence of both Einstein's math   
   >>> without his fudge factor, and Hubble's observation that the universe   
   >>> is expanding, What was it expanding from? Confirmation came with the   
   >>> discovery of the cosmic background radiation which had a value pretty   
   >>> close to that calculated if it happened, which earned Penzias and   
   >>> Wilson a Nobel Prize. It has since had further confirmation that we   
   >>> are on the right track, from things like the Berkeley/NASA COBE   
   >>> (Cosmic Background Explorer) project, and even observations through   
   >>> the Hubble space telescope which didn't go back quite as far but   
   >>> fitted the theory as far back as they were able to go..   
   >>>   
   >> I'm amazed Chris, but you are exactly right!   
   >   
   > Why are you amazed, imbecile?   
    >   
   Same reason you are an illegitimate bastard.   
   >   
   > It's common knowledge.   
    >   
      
   >   
   >>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Bang   
   >>>   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)