Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.agnosticism    |    A religion for those who hate religion?    |    213,518 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 212,854 of 213,518    |
|    "R. Dean" <"R. to R. Dean    |
|    Re: Does the Multiverse do Away With the    |
|    22 Nov 16 02:51:21    |
      XPost: alt.talk.creationism, alt.atheism       From: Dean"@gmail.com              On 11/19/2016 6:17 PM, R. Dean wrote:       > On 11/19/2016 1:32 PM, Christopher A. Lee wrote:       >> On Sat, 19 Nov 2016 13:19:24 -0500, "R. Dean" <"R. Dean"@gmail.com>       >> wrote:       >>       >>> On 11/18/2016 5:04 PM, Christopher A. Lee wrote:       >>>> On Fri, 18 Nov 2016 17:02:54 -0500, "R. Dean" <"R. Dean"@gmail.com>       >>>> wrote:       >>>>       >>>>> On 11/15/2016 5:34 PM, Lucifer Morningstar wrote:       >>>>>> On Tue, 15 Nov 2016 13:18:04 -0500, "R. Dean" <"R. Dean"@gmail.com>       >>>>>> wrote:       >>>>>>       >>>>>>> There is some theatrical basis for the multiverse found       >>>>>>> in the expansion of the universe.       >>>>>>> Also in the interpretation of quantium mechanics. But       >>>>>>> there is no direct empirical evidence for other universes.       >>>>>>       >>>>>> That's true. The multiverse idea was made up by someone       >>>>>> who wants an explanation and who has no concept of science.       >>>>>>       >>>>> Then I suppose these people have no concept of science because       >>>>> they are proponents of the multiverse concept:       >>>>       >>>> Grow up.       >>>>       >>>>> Stephen Hawking, Brian Greene, Max Tegmark, Alan Guth, Andrei Linde,       >>>>> Michio Kaku, David Deutsch, Leonard Susskind, Alexander Vilenkin       >>>>> Yasunori Nomura, Raj Pathria, Laura Mersini-Houghton, Neil deGrasse       >>>>> Tyson, and Sean Carroll.       >>>>>       >>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multiverse       >>>>       >>>> THEY ALL ADMIT IT IS SPECULATIVE, imbecile.       >>>>       >>> Prove it. - you cannot!       >>       >> READ WHAT THEY WROTE, IN THE FULL CONTEXT INSTEAD OF CHERRY-PICKING       >> THE PART WHERE THEY DESCRIBE A COMMONLY HELD BELIEF AND THEN GO ON TO       >> SHOW WHY IT IS WRONG.        >       Had you read the article, you would have noted that Wikipedia headed       the list as Proponents and skeptics. And it listed the scientist I       listed above as _PROPONENTS_ including Hawking, Tyson, Linde etc.       Then it discussed the scientist and their arguments against the       multiverse notion. George Ellis and Paul Davies        |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca