XPost: alt.atheism, talk.atheism, talk.philosophy.humanism   
   XPost: sci.skeptic, alt.magick   
   From: sylvia@email.invalid   
      
   On 10-Apr-23 2:02 am, Skeeter wrote:   
   > In article <2rs43i1cs7g6r661rrq234pj0ngcc4s7k9@4ax.com>,   
   > twang@the.noodle says...   
   >>   
   >> Skeeter wrote:   
   >>> twang@the.noodle says...   
   >>>> Skeeter wrote:   
   >>>>> twang@the.noodle says...   
   >>>>>> Skeeter wrote:   
   >>>>>>> In article , sylvia@email.invalid   
   says...   
   >>>>>>>> On 08-Apr-23 2:52 pm, Michael McLean wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> Everything is the consequence of something. No thing can create   
   itself.   
   >>>>>>>>> It needs a cause. Thus eternal God or nothing would be here.   
   No thing   
   >>>>>>>>> can "be" before it is in order to bring itself into "being."   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> So, God can be eternal, but nothing else can, because.....?   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> Sylvia.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> He created it?   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> Could God create an eternal universe if he wanted to?   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> It wouldn't be eternal if it was created.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> So you mean no, God isn't powerful enough to create an   
   >>>> eternal universe.   
   >>>   
   >>>   
   >>> Twist it around as usual.   
   >>   
   >> You said it, not me.   
   >>   
   >>> If it was created it cannot be eternal.   
   >>   
   >> Of course it can. Any omnipotent god can create   
   >> something that lasts forever. If he can't, he's not   
   >> omnipotent and he needs to go back to god school.   
   >   
   > If it was created it had a beginning.   
      
   You mean God cannot create an eternal universe that had no beginning?   
      
   In any case, we already know that "omnipotence" contains a built-in   
   contradiction. Can God create something that He cannot destroy? Etc.   
      
   Sylvia.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   
|