XPost: alt.atheism, talk.atheism, talk.philosophy.humanism   
   XPost: sci.skeptic   
   From: f00@0f0.00f   
      
   % wrote:   
   > jojo wrote:   
   >> % wrote:   
   >>> jojo wrote:   
   >>>> % wrote:   
   >>>>> jojo wrote:   
   >>>>>> Xx/v]andrak|≡xX wrote:   
   >>>>>>> % wrote:   
   >>>>>>>> jojo wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>> % wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>> jojo wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>> % wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> jojo wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> % wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> jojo wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dawn Flood wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 10/4/2024 11:10 AM, Bob Casanova wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 4 Oct 2024 10:45:56 +0000, the following   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> appeared in   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sci.skeptic, posted by shogun :   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Bob Casanova wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 3 Oct 2024 08:00:25 +0000, the   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> following appeared in   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sci.skeptic, posted by shogun :   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Bob Casanova wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 3 Oct 2024 02:06:06 +0000, the   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> following appeared in   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sci.skeptic, posted by shogun :   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Bob Casanova wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 2 Oct 2024 16:59:04 +0000, the   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> following appeared in   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sci.skeptic, posted by shogun :   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Bob Casanova wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 02 Oct 2024 09:08:20 -0700, the   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> following appeared   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in sci.skeptic, posted by Don_from_AZ   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> shogun  writes:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Bob Casanova wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 1 Oct 2024 17:16:28 +0000,   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the following appeared in   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sci.skeptic, posted by sora   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> David Dalton wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sept. 30 is Blasphemy Day, which   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from Wikipedia “educates   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> individuals and groups about   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> blasphemy laws and defends freedom   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of expression, especially the open   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> criticism of religion which is   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> criminalized in many countries”.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> religion from 2k or 1k or 200 or   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> even 50 years ago is no longer   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> relevant.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Relevant to what?   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> relevant to helping people navigate   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> life in 2020s and post.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's relevant if you live anywhere in   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the Islamic controlled world, and   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> many other places as well.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yep. The answer to which you replied is   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hopelessly   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> parochial; "it's irrelevant to my   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> immediate social circle,   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> therefore it's irrelevant for everyone   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and everywhere".   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> i would regard religious people as   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fundamentally wrong, being on   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the wrong side of history. being wrong   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> also means it provides no   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> benefit to its adherents. they are   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> choosing to become obsolete.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There was no need to confirm what I wrote;   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I already knew I   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was correct.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> nice. so are you a pious person?   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why do you ask? It wouldn't affect the   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> accuracy of my   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> comment either way.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> i have no qualms with its accuracy. i am   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> curious and want to know   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the kind of views believers and non-believers   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> espouse.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hopefully, both "espouse" the same reality,   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the facts of   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which are not subject to belief or disbelief.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that's a nice dream.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Isn't it, though?   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Have a nice day, and try to expand beyond your   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> parochialism   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> WRT the relevance of religion; the world isn't   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> identical to   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your social circle.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hey Bob,   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Heads up about Jojo -- Mom needs to take his   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (her?) Internet away, and until that happens,   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> discretion is advised.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dawn   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dawn, dont be rude!!! also, i have a penis.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> where did you get it , by the train tracks   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> i got it because my cells differentiated because i   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> have a y chromosome.. aaa capiche?   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> that's no reason   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>> that is all the reason and the only reason.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> sorry , you have to post a pic with it beside your face   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> lol i am not posting it here or anywhere! now that i   
   >>>>>>>>> think about it, i have never taken its pic...   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> and make sure to wear your top hat   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> And your gay sweater   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> i dont think i will take a photo of my penis.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>> yes in a top hat   
   >>>>   
   >>>> hat or no hat.... wait top hat for the penis or the head?   
   >>>>   
   >>> both   
   >>   
   >> i dont have any hats, who wears hats anyway? i have never seen   
   >> anyone wearing a hat. these days people wear caps, and i dont   
   >> like those anyway.   
   >   
   > its not about what you have seen ,   
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)