Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.airports    |    Just one step above a dirty bus station    |    8,692 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 7,576 of 8,692    |
|    Dairenn Lombard to None    |
|    Re: AA Does it Again!    |
|    22 Nov 03 04:57:47    |
      XPost: rec.travel.air, alt.travel       From: dlombard@base-ix.com              None wrote:              > Yes, rumor has it (and it's a damn good rumor) that AA Flight Attendants       > routinely use the "appears to be intoxicated" FAA rule to deplane passengers       > they don't like. The passenger doesn't actually have to be intoxicated, the       > flight attendant only has to say that the passenger "appears to be       > intoxicated" and that's all it takes, the passenger gets tossed off the       > plane, and the flight attendant doesn't have to deal with a passenger they       > don't like.              I think it would take being a serious asshole before an FA would even care to       notice a passenger enough to resort to such an extreme measure, sir. If FAs       were booting pax off flights at the drop of a hat, for any reason at all (ie.,       an _actual_ power trip), then there'd really be a problem. And, management       will have done something about it. The AA FAs I've talked to have made it       perfectly clear that management will not tolerate any inappropriate action       towards paying customers when they have clear evidence of it being the case.              But this is what you do: You take names, you take numbers (dates, times,       flight numbers, willing witnesses phone numbers) and when it's over, you make       phone calls and send letters/email to the appropriate people, not just at AA       but if it's a real abuse of power, to the FAA, NTSB, the airport, etc. Not       bitch, whine and moan, carrying on about never flying that airline again. As a       business, they will bend-over backwards to do everything to make it up to a       customer to retain their business. But by the same token, they also have no       interest in attempting to keep around a sniveling, whining cry-baby who's using       a situation where they were justifiably removed from the flight to try and goat       sympathy points out of bystanders.              "Damn good" is hardly an empiracle basis on which to support a rumor, sir. I       suggest you back up these outlandish claims with something real, such as       evidence there has been an investigation into such rampid abuse of power.                     --       Dairenn Lombard |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca