XPost: rec.travel.air, alt.travel   
   From: gofig@mac.com   
      
   In article <400371B4.31AD84EA@nobody.com>, nobody    
   wrote:   
      
   > Edward Glamkowski wrote:   
   > > forth in paragraph 1 above, the foregoing resolutions, to use all   
   > > necessary means to uphold and implement resolution 660 (1990) and   
   > > all subsequent relevant resolutions and to restore international   
   > > peace and security in the area;"   
   >   
   > If you read this as "authorizes any country to invade Iraq without UN   
   > support", then you really need to take a grade school reading course.   
   >   
   > > Iraq failed to comply with even resolution 660, which is why   
   > > Saddam got his sorry butt kicked out of Kuwait at that time.   
   >   
   >   
   > > 8. Decides that Iraq shall unconditionally accept the destruction,   
   > > removal, or rendering harmless, under international supervision, of:   
   >   
   > WHERE ARE THE WMDs ? Are you aware that from 1992 onwards, the UN inspectors   
   > did exactly what is detailed in point 8 ? Are you aware that the UN had   
   > inventoried some weapons and were not able to VERIFY THEY HAD BEEN DESTROYED   
   > by the time the USA decided to evist the inspectors from Iaq because Iraq was   
   > complaining about some of the inspectors being CIA spies ? (whether true or   
   > not).   
   >   
   > Have you already forgotten that at the time of 1441, Iraq was FULLY complying   
   > and that this had been stated in February 2003 by both Blix and Baradei ?   
      
   That is not what they said.   
      
   In 1441, the game was over, the complete onus was on the butcher to   
   prove he was 100% compliant.   
      
   He was not.   
      
   jay   
   Mon Jan 12, 2004   
   mailto:gofig@mac.com   
      
      
   >   
   >   
   > WHERE ARE THE WMDs ?   
   >   
   >   
   > > "When I left office, there was a substantial amount of biological   
   > > and chemical material unaccounted for," Clinton said on CNN's   
   > > "Larry King Live."   
   >   
   > Do you know what "unaccounted for" means ?   
   >   
   > WHERE ARE THE WMDs ?   
   >   
   > > Clinton said he never found out whether a U.S.-British bombing   
   > > campaign he ordered in 1998 ended Saddam's capability of producing   
   > > chemical and biological weapons. "We might have gotten it all, we   
   > > might have gotten half of it, we might have gotten none of it," he   
   > > said.   
   >   
   > Bullshit. It is the UN which had supervised the destruction of all production   
   > facilities, and what was left was getting confirmation that Iraq had complied   
   > with requests to destroy remaining already produced banned weapons.   
   >   
   >   
   > And yes, 1441 does need clarification because either you have selective   
   > memory, or your media have not informed you about the realities of 1441. Why   
   > was there unanimous agreement on 1441 ? Because the USA buckled to the   
   > pressure from the rest of the world to remove the right to inavde Iraq and   
   > only put in "serious consequences", and more importantly, to require another   
   > resolution to confirm those consequences and more importantly, to confirm   
   that   
   > Iraq had not begun to comply with 1441.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)