XPost: rec.travel.air, alt.travel   
   From: alohacyberian@att.net   
      
   "Me"  wrote in message   
   news:srhi-7F2E50.16553712012004@comcast.ash.giganews.com...   
   >   
   > What are you talking about? There was a long trade embargo against Iraq.   
   > From what I have been hearing in the news lately, the embargo did prevent   
   > Saddam from building up his stash of WMD so it looks to me like this   
   > war was for nothing. Bush set out to find Saddam's WMD and retrieve them.   
   > That did not happen because Saddam had no WMD, as he claimed many times.   
   >   
   No, the Bush Administration set out to depose the regime of Saddam Hussein.   
   Mission accomplished. It's the media who's always had the love affair with   
   weapons of mass destruction. So, Saddam Hussein had to weapons of mass   
   destruction. You mean he didn't have the weapons of mass destruction he used   
   on the Iranians? You mean Hussein didn't have the weapons of mass destruction   
   he used on the Kurds? You mean Saddam didn't have the weapons of mass   
   destruction he frequently bragged about and used against his own people?   
   Sorta like Osama bin Laden posed no threat to the United States because he   
   had no missles with which to attack America, but two of them crashed into the   
   World Trade Center, one into the Pentagon and one intended for the White   
   House into a field in Pennsylvania? KM   
   --   
   (-:alohacyberian:-)  At my website there are 3000 live cameras or   
   visit NASA, play games, read jokes, send greeting cards & connect   
   to CNN news, NBA, the White House, Academy Awards or learn all   
   about Hawaii, Israel and more: http://keith.martin.home.att.net/   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)