XPost: rec.travel.air, alt.travel   
   From: devil@attglobal.net   
      
   On Wed, 14 Jan 2004 14:12:36 +0000, Charlie C. wrote:   
      
   > mnc@admin.u.nu (Miguel Cruz) wrote in   
   > news:R14Nb.8475$4l3.6384@nwrddc02.gnilink.net:   
   >   
   >>   
   >>   
   >> Nobody's claiming he never had them. Demonstrably he had.   
   >>   
   >> What most people are claiming, bolstered by recent history, is that   
   >> whatever weapons he may or may not have had clearly did not represent   
   >> any serious threat.   
   >>   
   >   
   > Except that before the war, everyone (Germans, Russians, CIA, etc...) said   
   > that Saddam had the weapons and was close to getting nuclear weapons.   
      
   TRemember that Blix couldn't find any evidence?   
      
   > French and Germain resistance to the war was largely because Saddam owed   
   > them so much money and had nothing to do with regard to any kind of   
   > morality.   
      
   Maybe you convinced yourself then that this was the reason?  The facts are   
   different though.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)