XPost: us.talk.headline-news, alt.travel, alt.law-enforcement.traffic   
   XPost: rec.autos.driving   
   From: mod_pol@igs.net   
      
   "James C. Reeves" wrote:   
   >   
   > "Le Mod Pol" wrote in message   
   > news:40478799.A13DAD45@igs.net...   
   > |   
   > |   
   > | Larry Bud wrote:   
   > | >   
   > | > > > Huh?? The point that was made was that it wasn't someone in a   
   > subcompact...it   
   > | > > > was someone in a SUV. The implication of "Le Mod Pol"'s post (using   
   > | > > > association) is that someone in a subcompact wouldn't do such a thing   
   > in the   
   > | > > > 1st place, but a SUV driver would. Which obviously is a ridiculous   
   > assertion.   
   > | > > > However, no where in the post do I read the thought or idea that it   
   > would be OK   
   > | > > > in either case (car or SUV)! Not sure where you came up with that.   
   > You've got   
   > | > > > to brush up on the 'ole reading comprehension skills!   
   > | >   
   > | > > Don't put words in my mouth -- fool!! You haven't got   
   > | > > a clue.   
   > | >   
   > | > Of course that's what you're implying. Just by the title of "All   
   > | > sorts of whackos drive suvs" you're implying that only an SUV driver   
   > | > would be nuts enough to do something like this. Anybody that can read   
   > | > above a 3rd grade level would come to the same conclusion. The   
   > | > problem is, you apparently can't write above a 3rd grade level. Get   
   > | > real.   
   > |   
   > | I guess you haven't passed kindergarten. Be that as it   
   > | may you have snipped the text to what you referred and   
   > | no one can check to see how you have twisted the sense   
   > | of my post which is clear in the header.   
   > |   
   > | BTW - the header is the only part I wrote   
   > |   
   > | I guess you are one of those whackos that also own SUVs   
   > | that they are not competent to drive, and that is why   
   > | you are whining.   
   > |   
   > | Then you apparently fell for my troll and the hook is   
   > | well buried in your mouth. What a sucker    
      
      
   > I had suggested a few days ago that you take the opportunity to restate what   
   > you meant and submit a revised post to clear up the confusion AND you've yet   
   to   
   > do it. We're all waiting to know what you really meant. So, instead of   
   > blasting people for misunderstanding what you wrote, why don't you clear up   
   the   
   > misunderstanding and tell us what you were really trying to say.   
      
   Why is it so difficult for you to understand 6 simple   
   words?   
   --   
    LP   
    In politics, moderation is the best policy.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   
|