XPost: us.talk.headline-news, alt.travel, alt.law-enforcement.traffic   
   XPost: rec.autos.driving   
   From: jcnospam@nospam.com   
      
   "Le Mod Pol"  wrote in message   
   news:4048CF5F.ECBB9767@igs.net...   
   |   
   |   
   | "James C. Reeves" wrote:   
   | >   
   | > "Le Mod Pol"  wrote in message   
   | > news:40478799.A13DAD45@igs.net...   
   | > |   
   | > |   
   | > | Larry Bud wrote:   
   | > | >   
   | > | > > > Huh??  The point that was made was that it wasn't someone in a   
   | > subcompact...it   
   | > | > > > was someone in a SUV.  The implication of "Le Mod Pol"'s post   
   (using   
   | > | > > > association) is that someone in a subcompact wouldn't do such a   
   thing   
   | > in the   
   | > | > > > 1st place, but a SUV driver would.  Which obviously is a ridiculous   
   | > assertion.   
   | > | > > > However, no where in the post do I read the thought or idea that it   
   | > would be OK   
   | > | > > > in either case (car or SUV)!  Not sure where you came up with that.   
   | > You've got   
   | > | > > > to brush up on the 'ole reading comprehension skills!   
   | > | >   
   | > | > > Don't put words in my mouth -- fool!!  You haven't got   
   | > | > > a clue.   
   | > | >   
   | > | > Of course that's what you're implying.  Just by the title of "All   
   | > | > sorts of whackos drive suvs" you're implying that only an SUV driver   
   | > | > would be nuts enough to do something like this.  Anybody that can read   
   | > | > above a 3rd grade level would come to the same conclusion.  The   
   | > | > problem is, you apparently can't write above a 3rd grade level.  Get   
   | > | > real.   
   | > |   
   | > | I guess you haven't passed kindergarten.  Be that as it   
   | > | may you have snipped the text to what you referred and   
   | > | no one can check to see how you have twisted the sense   
   | > | of my post which is clear in the header.   
   | > |   
   | > | BTW - the header is the only part I wrote   
   | > |   
   | > | I guess you are one of those whackos that also own SUVs   
   | > | that they are not competent to drive, and that is why   
   | > | you are whining.   
   | > |   
   | > | Then you apparently fell for my troll and the hook is   
   | > | well buried in your mouth.  What a sucker    
   |   
   |   
   | > I had suggested a few days ago that you take the opportunity to restate   
   what   
   | > you meant and submit a revised post to clear up the confusion AND you've   
   yet to   
   | > do it.  We're all waiting to know what you really meant.  So, instead of   
   | > blasting people for misunderstanding what you wrote, why don't you clear up   
   the   
   | > misunderstanding and tell us what you were really trying to say.   
   |   
   | Why is it so difficult for you to understand 6 simple   
   | words?   
   | --   
   | LP   
   | In politics, moderation is the best policy.   
      
   You didn't notice that _everyone_ that responded to you apparently didn't   
   understand the intent of your post?  If you don't want to accept a courteous   
   request to clarify for us, that is certainly fine.   But might I suggest to you   
   that if everyone didn't understand the message that you had intended to convey,   
   it is most likely because the content of your post wasn't clear, not because of   
   any comprehension problems of every one of those persons that have read it.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)