XPost: alt.privacy.anon-server, talk.politics.guns, aus.politics.guns
XPost: alt.survival
From: maximusheadroom@gmx.com
In news:IsSdnS5NDbmFPXvFnZ2dnUU7-IudnZ2d@westnet.com.au, de chucka
typed:
> On 7/04/2017 3:38 AM, RD Sandman wrote:
>> de chucka wrote in
>> news:DY6dnXWDUfN7EHjFnZ2dnUU7-LPNnZ2d@westnet.com.au:
>>> On 6/04/2017 9:48 AM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
>>>> On Thu, 6 Apr 2017 07:17:56 +1000, de chucka
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> On 6/04/2017 4:55 AM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
>>>>>> On Wed, 5 Apr 2017 11:52:09 +1000, de chucka
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> snip
>>>>>>> es
>>>>>>>>>> So you're claiming if she WAS carrying her permit, she would
>>>>>>>>>> NOT be breaking the law?
>>>>>>>>> As that is what she was charged ( according to the reports ) I'd
>>>>>>>>> say NO or at least she'd have a better defence
>>>>>>>> You said
>>>>>>>>> Of course she was not carrying her Alabama permit
>>>>>>>>> so was breaking the law.
>>>>>>>> That implies if she WAS carrying her permit, she would NOT have
>>>>>>>> been breaking the law.
>>>>>>> Sounds good to me
>>>>>> It sounds good to you because it's wrong.
>>>>> Why is it wrong given what she was charged with?
>>>> Because a CCW doesn't allow you to legally carry anywhere in an
>>>> airport. You should know this.
>>> but she carried it in accidently
>> The point is that she was in an area where her CCW permit doesn't do her
>> a damn bit of good. I have a CCW permit but trying to carry a Glock into
>> the White House would get me jailed.
> The point is she did the right thing in reporting the accident but
> didn't have her permit
The permit is irrelevant to her arrest.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
