XPost: alt.privacy.anon-server, talk.politics.guns, aus.politics.guns   
   XPost: alt.survival   
   From: maximusheadroom@gmx.com   
      
   In news:FvOdnbh-PrjDZnrFnZ2dnUU7-WmdnZ2d@westnet.com.au, de chucka   
    typed:   
      
   > On 7/04/2017 3:29 PM, max headroom wrote:   
      
   >> In news:WradncbWQ9PphXrFnZ2dnUU7-LXNnZ2d@westnet.com.au, de chucka   
   >>  typed:   
      
   >>> On 7/04/2017 1:36 PM, max headroom wrote:   
      
   >>>> In news:4_udneZHw_W1ZXvFnZ2dnUU7-I3NnZ2d@westnet.com.au, de chucka   
   >>>>  typed:   
      
   >>>>> On 7/04/2017 9:13 AM, max headroom wrote:   
      
   >>>>>> In news:IsSdnS5NDbmFPXvFnZ2dnUU7-IudnZ2d@westnet.com.au, de chucka   
   >>>>>>  typed:   
      
   >>>>>>> On 7/04/2017 3:38 AM, RD Sandman wrote:   
      
   >>>>>>>> de chucka  wrote in   
   >>>>>>>> news:DY6dnXWDUfN7EHjFnZ2dnUU7-LPNnZ2d@westnet.com.au:   
      
   >>>>>>>>> On 6/04/2017 9:48 AM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:   
      
   >>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 6 Apr 2017 07:17:56 +1000, de chucka    
   >>>>>>>>>> wrote:   
      
   >>>>>>>>>>> On 6/04/2017 4:55 AM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:   
      
   >>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 5 Apr 2017 11:52:09 +1000, de chucka   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>  wrote:   
      
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> snip   
      
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> es   
      
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So you're claiming if she WAS carrying her permit, she would   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> NOT be breaking the law?   
      
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> As that is what she was charged ( according to the reports )   
   I'd   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> say NO or at least she'd have a better defence   
      
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> You said   
      
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Of course she was not carrying her Alabama permit   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> so was breaking the law.   
      
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> That implies if she WAS carrying her permit, she would NOT have   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> been breaking the law.   
      
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> Sounds good to me   
      
   >>>>>>>>>>>> It sounds good to you because it's wrong.   
   >>>>>>>>>>> Why is it wrong given what she was charged with?   
      
   >>>>>>>>>> Because a CCW doesn't allow you to legally carry anywhere in an   
   >>>>>>>>>> airport. You should know this.   
      
   >>>>>>>>> but she carried it in accidently   
      
   >>>>>>>> The point is that she was in an area where her CCW permit doesn't do   
   >>>>>>>> her a damn bit of good.  I have a CCW permit but trying to carry a   
   >>>>>>>> Glock into the White House would get me jailed.   
      
   >>>>>>> The point is she did the right thing in reporting the accident but   
   >>>>>>> didn't have her permit   
      
   >>>>>> The permit is irrelevant to her arrest.   
      
   >>>>> All the fake news going around   
      
   >>>>> Jackson says she had a permit for the gun but told the officer it wasn't   
   >>>>> on her, and was out of Alabama, according to the report.   
      
   >>>> I'm sure that's true.   
      
   >>>>> Jackson was placed under arrest and charged with unauthorized possession   
   >>>>> of a firearm.   
      
   >>>> I'm sure that's true, also.   
      
   >>>>> Read more:   
   >>>>> http://www.cbs46.com/story/35028245/woman-accidentally-get   
   -loaded-gun-through-security-at-atlanta-airport#ixzz4dWhfOjSj   
      
   >>>> The permit is irrelevant to her arrest.   
      
   >>> you keep blabbing that but can't back it up   
      
   >>> http://www.ajc.com/news/local/guns-found-tsa-checkpoints-cou   
   d-mean-fine-jail-time-for-travelers/UadDVLXW1ef12hFwosaSZM/   
      
   >> Congratulations. You discovered what we already knew.   
      
   > So why are you arguing with me?   
      
   Because you were wrong... again.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)