XPost: talk.politics.guns, aus.politics.guns, alt.survival   
   From: klausschadenfreude-nospam@null.net   
      
   On Fri, 14 Apr 2017 07:37:58 +1000, de chucka    
   wrote:   
      
   >On 13/04/2017 8:26 PM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:   
   >> On Thu, 13 Apr 2017 10:57:59 +1000, de chucka    
   >> wrote:   
   >>   
   >>> On 12/04/2017 8:30 PM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:   
   >>>> On Wed, 12 Apr 2017 07:01:38 +1000, de chucka    
   >>>> wrote:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>> On 9/04/2017 11:42 PM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:   
   >>>>>> On Sun, 9 Apr 2017 08:16:08 +1000, de chucka    
   >>>>>> wrote:   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> You can't explain how a permit would allow her to legally carry a   
   >>>>>>>>>> weapon through the TSA checkpoint, though.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> It wouldn't but if she had it she wouldn't have been charged.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> Yes, she would have. See the law I quoted above.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> Did she will-fully and knowingly carry it in?   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> Doesn't matter.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> Does according to Georgian law and Arizona law   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Too bad. We're talking federal law here. You lose again.   
   >>>   
   >>> Please State the law   
   >>   
   >> I already did that once for you. How many times do I need to do it?   
   >>   
   >> Message-ID:    
   >>   
   >> Why are you so fucking stupid?   
   >   
   >but that shows intent is needed, hey you've proved yourself wrong. WELL   
   >DONE rubes   
   >>   
      
   You need to read it again.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)