XPost: talk.politics.guns, aus.politics.guns, alt.survival   
   From: klausschadenfreude-nospam@null.net   
      
   On Sat, 15 Apr 2017 08:38:53 +1000, de chucka    
   wrote:   
      
   >On 15/04/2017 4:35 AM, RD Sandman wrote:   
   >> de chucka  wrote in   
   >> news:hYidnXEDG4a0bXLFnZ2dnUU7-KmdnZ2d@westnet.com.au:   
   >>   
   >>> On 13/04/2017 3:17 PM, max headroom wrote:   
   >>>> In news:fcmdnQO-hZ_HTHPFnZ2dnUU7-b3NnZ2d@westnet.com.au, de chucka   
   >>>>  typed:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>> On 13/04/2017 2:18 AM, RD Sandman wrote:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>>> 3.  Federal law is what covers the restricted areas of airports...   
   >>>>   
   >>>>> and also mentions knowingly and willfully   
   >>>>> http://www.gunlawsbystate.com/#!/federal-regulation/airports-and-airc   
   >>>>> raft/iii-entering-airport-or-aircraft-in-violation-of-security-requir   
   >>>>> ements/   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Do you even read your own cites???   
   >>>>   
   >>>> "A person may not knowingly and willfully   
   >>>   
   >>> Thank you for your support " knowingly and willfully" does not apply   
   >>> in this case   
   >>   
   >> I would assume that the term "knowingly and willfully" would be the case   
   >> here unless that gun climbed into her purse without her knowledge.   
   >   
   >Putting it "knowingly and willfully" into a purse and forgetting about   
   >it is different from "knowingly and willfully" carrying a gun into a   
   >secure area.   
      
   So you're actually dumb enough to think that just telling them you   
   "forgot" and showing them your permit is enough for them to say, "OK,   
   see ya!"   
      
   LOL   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)