XPost: talk.politics.guns, aus.politics.guns, alt.survival   
   From: klausschadenfreude-nospam@null.net   
      
   On Tue, 18 Apr 2017 10:35:58 +1000, de chucka    
   wrote:   
      
   >On 18/04/2017 10:05 AM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:   
   >> On Tue, 18 Apr 2017 07:50:00 +1000, de chucka    
   >> wrote:   
   >>   
   >>> On 17/04/2017 10:49 PM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:   
   >>>> On Mon, 17 Apr 2017 08:46:32 +1000, de chucka    
   >>>> wrote:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>> snip   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>>> The bit where it applies to getting on a plane, she didn't   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> You're kind of dense. Let's try again.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> May I suggest that you read the whole provision, Google is your friend,   
   and you won't keep making an arse of yourself   
   >>>>   
   >>>> As you usually do, you snip out what proves you wrong.   
   >>> The provision is totally out of context as you know   
   >>   
   >> It's entirely in context, and it would be obvious if you had more than   
   >> two brain cells to rub together.   
   >   
   >As you didn't even manage to figure out the opening story but kept   
   >commenting on it your opinion is dismissed.   
      
   You always dismiss everyone's "opinion" when they're right. It's of   
   little consequence. You want to remain ignorant for some reason, and   
   you have that right.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)