XPost: talk.politics.guns, aus.politics.guns, alt.survival   
   From: klausschadenfreude-nospam@null.net   
      
   On Tue, 18 Apr 2017 13:01:52 +1000, de chucka    
   wrote:   
      
   >On 18/04/2017 11:11 AM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:   
   >> On Tue, 18 Apr 2017 10:35:58 +1000, de chucka    
   >> wrote:   
   >>   
   >>> On 18/04/2017 10:05 AM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:   
   >>>> On Tue, 18 Apr 2017 07:50:00 +1000, de chucka    
   >>>> wrote:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>> On 17/04/2017 10:49 PM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:   
   >>>>>> On Mon, 17 Apr 2017 08:46:32 +1000, de chucka    
   >>>>>> wrote:   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> snip   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> The bit where it applies to getting on a plane, she didn't   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> You're kind of dense. Let's try again.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> May I suggest that you read the whole provision, Google is your   
   friend, and you won't keep making an arse of yourself   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> As you usually do, you snip out what proves you wrong.   
   >>>>> The provision is totally out of context as you know   
   >>>>   
   >>>> It's entirely in context, and it would be obvious if you had more than   
   >>>> two brain cells to rub together.   
   >>>   
   >>> As you didn't even manage to figure out the opening story but kept   
   >>> commenting on it your opinion is dismissed. You obviously haven't read the   
   context   
   >   
   >>   
   >> You always dismiss everyone's "opinion" when they're right. It's of   
   >> little consequence. You want to remain ignorant for some reason, and   
   >> you have that right.   
   >   
   >I dismiss it when [..]   
      
   You've been proven wrong.   
      
   NEXT!   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)