b5a77897   
   24fbee37   
   XPost: soc.culture.asian.american, soc.culture.african.american,   
   soc.culture.mexican.american   
   XPost: alt.politics.sex, us.politics.elections   
   From: dalton@nfld.com   
      
   On Mar 8, 2024, David Dalton wrote   
   (in article<0001HW.2B9BF989008CCE2570000880838F@news.eternal-september.org>):   
      
   > On Mar 8, 2024, David Dalton wrote   
   > (in article<0001HW.2B9AD9A8005E863C70000880838F@news.eternal-september.org>):   
   >   
   > > Here is an excerpt from my   
   > > “International Women’s Day attempt” thread   
   > > on alt.religion.druid, that might be of interest:   
   > >   
   > > But note that time has advanced such that Joe and Jill Biden   
   > > no longer have had at least one temporary breakup of more   
   > > than a week in the last five years, so in A-HDBE Joe went   
   > > from straight-type-1-M to straight-type-2-M and is now   
   > > optimally compatible with bif (woman attracted to both   
   > > genders) Jill, and they have not been broken up. Thus my   
   > > matches of a few years ago of Joe to Bette Midler and   
   > > Jill to Ron Howard are no longer valid. And the optimal   
   > > sexual compatibility should contribute to their physical   
   > > and mental health. Yes, b’y, then. :-)   
   > >   
   > > However, they won’t be locked for life until they next have sex.   
   >   
   > I jumped the gun last night, but the above should now   
   > be true, as of 8:34 p.m. EST March 8, 2024, the   
   > fifth anniversary of the start of my first accurate   
   > matchmaking period (and International Women’s Day).   
   >   
   > They can test optimal sexual compatibility by   
   > electric, warming, compatible touch, increased   
   > attraction, and increased orgasm intensity.   
   >   
   > Why would they have been broken up? As a country   
   > leader, Joe Biden is an assisted shaktipat recipient (a.s.r.).   
   > And a.s.r. will lose partial sexual compatibility, so   
   > relationships involving at least one a.s.r. that are   
   > not optimally sexually compatible to start with or   
   > made so by (A,F)-HDBE will be broken up. So it is   
   > not that the relationship has been abusive.   
   >   
   > On the other hand, Donald and Melania Trump (neither   
   > of whom is an a.s.r.) have been separated across   
   > species boundaries in the species split, so their   
   > relationship must have been abusive. A good match   
   > for Melania is Chris Isaak, and a good match for   
   > Donald is Sarah Palin.   
      
   I am trying again in the thread “St.Patrick’s Week attempt”   
   on alt.religion.druid, and the above should now be true.   
      
   --   
   David Dalton dalton@nfld.com https://www.nfld.com/~dalton (home page)   
   https://www.nfld.com/~dalton/dtales.html Salmon on the Thorns (mystic page)   
   “And the cart is on a wheel; And the wheel is on a hill;   
   And the hill is shifting sand; And inside these laws we stand" (Ferron)   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)