Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.america    |    Everything American I think    |    102,769 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 102,666 of 102,769    |
|    Leroy N. Soetoro to All    |
|    A second Trump term would break the back    |
|    17 Jul 24 22:17:53    |
      XPost: alt.politics.trump, alt.politics.republicans, talk.politics.guns       XPost: sac.politics, talk.politics.misc       From: democrat-criminals@mail.house.gov              https://thehill.com/opinion/white-house/4772297-a-second-trump-term-would-       break-the-back-of-the-bureaucracy/              The Supreme Court’s recent ruling in the Loper Bright case, overturning       the doctrine of “Chevron deference,” is poised to shatter America’s       bureaucracy. It will allow federal judges to void any regulation they do       not believe Congress expressly gave agencies power to create.              With the federal bureaucracy already on life support after this explosive       decision, we now face the very real possibility that a second term for       former President Donald Trump will break the back of the bureaucracy,       finishing off the institutional apparatus that is our modern state. The       result may well be championed by conservatives, but the quality of life       for Americans would be substantially worse, should it come to pass.              America’s administrative state developed as a result of purposeful and       deliberative congressional action. Congress created agencies in the       executive branch which they then imbued with lawmaking authority. The       legislative process in Congress is incredibly slow and difficult,       particularly in times of heightened partisanship. In contrast, the       regulatory procedures outlined in the Administrative Procedures Act is       substantially swifter and simpler. In an era when Congress can barely       agree to pay our debt on time, expecting it to be able to work out a       substantial number of complex regulatory issues is a pipe dream.              Another reason Congress built up the bureaucracy is that it understood       that its membership was not composed of subject-matter experts in highly       technical fields, but of those that were laymen to the myriad modern       issues that required regulation. Building a bureaucracy that is staffed       with these sorts of experts is an elegant solution to this problem.              A key feature of America’s bureaucracy is that, unlike private-sector       employees, those with federal government jobs are notoriously difficult to       fire. This is largely thanks to a 19th-century act of Congress that       modernized the bureaucracy, doing away with the “spoils system” that had       dominated federal hiring up until that time. Before this act was passed,       federal jobs were usually handed out to lackeys and loyalists who were       hired because of their political connections, not merit.              No longer built off a system of patronage, the federal bureaucracy has       been allowed to flourish over the last several decades into what could       fairly be called America’s fourth and most functional branch of       government. However, because individual workers are so difficult to fire,       presidents have oftentimes found managing the bureaucracy to be about as       easy to accomplish as herding cats.              As such, it admittedly makes some sense when this quasi-fourth branch of       government is referred to as the “deep state.” The people running these       agencies on a daily basis tend to stick around through several       presidential administrations over their careers and have the ability to       frustrate an administration’s agenda with little worry of recourse.              The organizational complexity of the bureaucracy is the chief reason why       political scientists often refer to the executive branch as the       “managerial presidency” — much of an administration’s success is       determined by the president’s ability to get this vast apparatus to carry       out his agenda. President Harry Truman famously illustrated how       frustrating this could be when speaking about incoming president Gen.       Dwight Eisenhower, whose experience was in the military, where orders are       followed without question. Truman quipped, “Poor Ike. He’ll say do this       and do that and nothing at all will happen.”              Trump was himself also notoriously unable to bend the bureaucracy to his       will, which often prevented him from effectively moving policy in as       conservative a direction as he desired. Should he get a second term, Trump       will look to effectuate the old adage “that which does not bend will       break.” To obliterate the resistance that plagued him in the past, his       plan is to issue an executive order reclassifying the vast majority of       federal employees in order to make it easy to fire them. Once they are       gone, he will then look to have them replaced with loyalists who will       unquestionably carry out his orders.              A return to the spoils system would mean America’s professionalized       bureaucracy would no longer staffed with individuals who have spent their       lifetime studying incredibly narrow topics, like whether a yeast       derivative is a drug or dietary supplement. Instead, it will be headed by       individuals looking to effectuate a political agenda, which in the case of       the Republican Party is to abolish as many regulations as is possible       under most all circumstances. The lack of regulation could well help       businesses improve their bottom lines, but it will come at the cost of the       health and safety of the average American.                     --       We live in a time where intelligent people are being silenced so that       stupid people won't be offended.              Durham Report: The FBI has an integrity problem. It has none.              No collusion - Special Counsel Robert Swan Mueller III, March 2019.       Officially made Nancy Pelosi a two-time impeachment loser.              Thank you for cleaning up the disaster of the 2008-2017 Obama / Biden       fiasco, President Trump.              Under Barack Obama's leadership, the United States of America became the       The World According To Garp. Obama sold out heterosexuals for Hollywood       queer liberal democrat donors.              President Trump boosted the economy, reduced illegal invasions, appointed       dozens of judges and three SCOTUS justices.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca