Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.america    |    Everything American I think    |    102,769 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 102,693 of 102,769    |
|    Leroy N. Soetoro to All    |
|    Five Years Later, the McCloskeys Still H    |
|    09 Jul 25 22:03:32    |
      XPost: alt.politics.usa.constitution.gun-rights, stl.general, ta       k.politics.guns       XPost: sac.politics, alt.politics.republicans       From: leroysoetoro@americans-first.com              https://bearingarms.com/camedwards/2025/07/02/five-years-later-the-       mccloskeys-still-havent-gotten-their-guns-back-n1229146              I know the wheels of justice grind slowly, but this is ridiculous.              It's been almost five years since Mark and Patricia McCloskey had their       lawfully-owned guns taken from them and were charged by St. Louis       prosecutor Kimberly Garner with unlawful use of a weapon for displaying       firearms outside their home as a large swarm of protestors marched through       their neighborhood just a few weeks after the city's deadly riots in early       June, 2020.              It's been more than four years since the couple pleaded guilty to       misdemeanor offenses, and almost four years since the pair were pardoned       by then-Missouri governor Mike Parson.              Shortly thereafter, Mark McCloskey sued to get their guns back, but was       rebuffed by a circuit court judge and the Missouri Court of Appeals, which       upheld the lower court ruling in December, 2023.              "Missouri law is unequivocal that a gubernatorial pardon obliterates the       fact of the conviction, not the fact of guilt," the appeals court said.              "The guilty plea ... triggered the guns' forfeiture," the court said.       "Since McCloskey's guilt remains, it follows that he is not entitled to       the return of the weapons."              Keep in mind that Mark and Patricia McCloskey can both go into a gun store       and legally purchase a firearm, which makes the judges' decision that he's       not entitled to get his guns back even more ridiculous.              Mark McCloskey sued St. Louis in January, 2022 over the decision not to       return his guns, but they also sought to expunge their criminal records,       which would formally remove their guilty plea from the public record and       should allow them to get their guns back. Last June a St. Louis County       judge granted that request over the objections of city officials and the       local prosecutor, who claimed they're a "continued threat to public       safety" who have "shown no remorse for the impact of their actions."              Amazingly, even after that decision the St. Louis Police Department wasn't       ready to give up. The department appealed the decision to the Eastern       District Missouri Court of Appeals, once again arguing that the McCloskeys       are a threat to public safety. On Tuesday the court released its decision       denying the department's request and upholding the expungement.              A three-judge panel found the circuit court judge did not err in       determining the couple met the criteria for expungement after they gained       notoriety for displaying their weapons outside of their Central West End       mansion as protesters moved through the neighborhood.              Chief Judge John Torbitzky, who authored the seven-page decision,       dismissed the police department’s claims that the two were a threat to       public safety.              “The circuit court provided an adequate opportunity for the department to       make an offer of proof, but the department failed to make use of that       opportunity,” Torbitzky wrote.              McCloskey's lawsuit against the city has been on hold for awhile, and the       next hearing isn't scheduled to take place until December of this year. If       the St. Louis PD decides to appeal yesterday's decision to the Missouri       Supreme Court it could drag out the return of McCloskey's guns well into       2026, if not beyond.              St. Louis Circuit Attorney Gabriel E. Gore claims to "believe in fairness"       and the opportunity for non-violent offenders to "get their lives back on       track." If he truly believes that, he should buck the Democrat machine in       St. Louis and side with the McCloskeys in their legal fight to have their       guns returned.              That will never happen, but the McCloskeys are almost certain to       (eventually) win their fight to have their records expunged and their       firearms returned. Five years is far too long, though, and justice delayed       is justice denied.                     --       November 5, 2024 - Congratulations President Donald Trump. We look       forward to America being great again.              We live in a time where intelligent people are being silenced so that       stupid people won't be offended.              Every day is an IQ test. Some pass, some, not so much.              Thank you for cleaning up the disasters of the 2008-2017, 2020-2024 Obama       / Biden / Harris fiascos, President Trump.              Under Barack Obama's leadership, the United States of America became the       The World According To Garp. Obama sold out heterosexuals for Hollywood       queer liberal democrat donors.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca