Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.america    |    Everything American I think    |    102,769 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 102,694 of 102,769    |
|    Leroy N. Soetoro to All    |
|    Saint Louis Anti-Gun Editorial an Unhing    |
|    09 Jul 25 21:45:29    |
      XPost: stl.general, talk.politics.guns, sac.politics       XPost: alt.journalism.criticism, alt.politics.republicans       From: leroysoetoro@americans-first.com              https://bearingarms.com/tomknighton/2025/07/02/saint-louis-anti-gun-       editorial-an-unhinged-screed-with-loose-relationship-with-facts-n1229142              I read a lot of editorials.              By that, I mean those written by a paper's editorial board. A lot of       people think of editorials as the same as op-eds, and they're not. Op-eds       are the thoughts of a single person who writes for the publication. They       may or may not represent the values of that publication in what they       write. Their opinions are their own, as many op-ed pages note to some       degree or another.              Editorial boards craft the official stance of a publication, which is part       of why I can honestly tell you that pretty much every major and second-       tier news publication in this country that's not expressly conservative in       its direction is anti-gun.              They make it very clear.              And the editorial board at the Saint Louis Post-Dispatch is doing nothing       to dissuade me from that opinion with an editorial titled, "Editorial:       Guns kill kids more often in Missouri than in most states. It's not       coincidence."              Guns don’t kill, people kill, goes the popular old trope against rational       gun-safety laws. Setting aside that it’s not strictly true (what about       accidental discharges of found firearms, which kill hundreds of kids a       year?), the trope is always colliding with inconvenient data.              No, it's not.              In every single instance, the gun did nothing by itself. Someone had to       pull the trigger. Even in negligent discharges of "found firearms." The       phrase doesn't imply that every death by gunfire is intentional. It's only       pointing out that someone pulled that trigger and that is where the fault       lies.              However, people like the members of the editorial board continue to try       and pretend that the guns are the issue, as if people have absolutely no       responsibility in the matter.              If “guns don’t kill, people kill,” how to explain the fact that Americans       are statistically far more likely to be killed by guns in states such as       Missouri, which has almost no restrictions on adult gun possession, than       in states that have substantive restrictions? Are Missourians just worse       people than, say, Illinoisans or New Yorkers? We don’t think so; the gun       lobby apparently does.              Actually, the gun lobby believes no such thing.              However, the gun control lobby and the editorial board seem to believe       that people in Missouri are so psychologically and emotionally weak as to       be driven to commit horrible atrocities simply because the tools they can       use for that are more readily available in their state than in others.              What else can one surmise from this line of "reasoning" presented here?              The latest inconvenient data comes courtesy of the American Medical       Association. In a major new study of pediatric firearms deaths, the AMA       charts the clear correlation between states’ gun-safety policies and the       rates by which children are killed by guns.              The study in question has massive flaws, as we've pointed out previously.       Plus, it's correlation, which doesn't necessarily mean there's causation.       That's an important point because we've seen the homicide rate go down       since Bruen actually forced anti-gun states to stop restricting who can       get permits to only a handful of people.              If more guns meant more crime, we should see the opposite, and we don't.              The short version: Missouri remains a dangerous place to be a kid.              Start with the unacceptable, horrendous, nauseating fact that guns are the       leading cause of death today for American children. That’s not the case in       any other advanced country. Just us. Firearms take roughly seven young       American lives a day, every day. Is it a coincidence that the country with       the loosest gun laws, and more guns per capita than anyone else, also       buries child victims of firearms at a higher rate than any other country?       Or (again) are Americans just worse people?              Actually, they're not the leading cause of death in children unless you       really think legal adults who can buy property, sign contracts, live on       their own, start careers, and enlist in the military are still actually       children.              In that case, you've got other issues.              As for comparing the United States to other countries, what we find out in       many cases is that our non-gun homicide rate is higher than most developed       nations' total homicide rates. While we haven't broken that down by age,       my bet is that we'd find that to hold true across the various age       demographics.              Why?              Because there's something we have here that those countries don't. I can       speculate what precisely that is, but it's an important data point that       needs to be mentioned when you start going on about how we've got so many       more "gun deaths" than these other countries. I mean, yeah, we do, but we       have more non-gun murders, too, and that's something that should be       considered.              Throughout the entire screed that outlines the Post-Dispatch's official       position, they're coming from a position predicated on misinformation, bad       research, poor understanding of the statistics, and a host of other fact       that they've opted to ignore, either because they were too stupid to think       to look for themselves or because they knew what they'd find. Or both.                     --       November 5, 2024 - Congratulations President Donald Trump. We look       forward to America being great again.              We live in a time where intelligent people are being silenced so that       stupid people won't be offended.              Every day is an IQ test. Some pass, some, not so much.              Thank you for cleaning up the disasters of the 2008-2017, 2020-2024 Obama       / Biden / Harris fiascos, President Trump.              Under Barack Obama's leadership, the United States of America became the       The World According To Garp. Obama sold out heterosexuals for Hollywood       queer liberal democrat donors.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca