home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   alt.anagrams      Creative manipulation of English words?      19,138 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 17,190 of 19,138   
   Debra to Vincent Maycock   
   Re: HE IS RISEN ~ IN HIS SEER. (3/3)   
   08 Dec 14 05:49:36   
   
   [continued from previous message]   
      
   > >sometimes had great impact on my life and/or the life of another   
   > >and/or lives of others, finding this explanation meant a lot to me.   
   > >In sum, the Readings say that intuition is God's personal communication   
   > >to an individual person. Taking the concept that God sees and knows   
   > >everything, this explanation made sense to me because intuition and   
   > >gut feeling are always right. An all-seeing all-knowing God could   
   > >certainly always be right. In addition to all of this, one day I felt   
   > >"led" to visit the A.R.E., and after I got there at a certain point   
   > >I felt "led" to sit in one of the four chairs in the lobby all of   
   > >which had no occupants. In two seconds a man swiftly sat down in the   
   > >chair next to me and I immediately "felt certain" that he was going   
   > >to speak to me, and thus he did.    
   >    
   > Probably because he sat down next to you.  If he had no intention of   
   > talking to you, he would have chosen a seat farther away.   
   >    
   > >After an exchange of a few words or   
   > >so he went straight to posing a question to me - probably the main    
   > >purpose for which he sat and spoke - which was, "What do you personally   
   > >see as being the most important information in the Readings?", to   
   > >which I immediately replied, "The statement that what is called   
   > >intuition is God speaking to a person." This is the absolute truth: Once   
   > >I gave him that immediate answer, he immediately said to me that the   
   > >reason why he was currently at the A.R.E. was because he was ATTENDING   
   > >THE CONFERENCE ON INTUITION [which conference I had no idea was in    
   > >process]!   
   >    
   > Hmmm... sounds odd.  You went all the way to the A.R.E., without   
   > knowing what the conference there was about, and never saw any signs   
   > posted about what it was about, and never heard anyone talking about   
   > what it was about until this guy approached you to provide you with   
   > this important bit of information?   
   >    
   > I would suggest that if indeed you did wander down to the A.R.E. in   
   > the confused manner that you say you recall, you probably saw some   
   > sign posted or overheard someone saying "Oh, I'm fascinated by what   
   > this guy has to say about intuition," or something and simply guessed   
   > that that was the answer the guy was looking for on the grounds that   
   > that was what people were talking about at that conference.   
   >    
   > > We both then shared with each other that we were deeply   
   > >affected by the experience and exchange of our meeting and then he   
   > >left to continue with the conference [apparently he had been on a break].   
   > >In sum, my personal experiences of intuition and gut feeling have, for me   
   > >personally, been evidence and enough evidence that spirit God exists   
   > >and that he and I have a living constant relationship. Plus there are   
   > >other things I consider evidence and enough evidence of God's existence,   
   > >but I am trying to not write a book here and thought I would at least   
   > >share one of them.   
   > >   
   > >Evidence For Soul:   
   > >   
   > >Evidence for me, and enough evidence for me, beside some other things,   
   > >that what I am is a Soul - or triune etheric being composed of    
   > >consciousness + will + spirit,   
   >    
   > You're assuming your conclusions:  the existence of a spirit is what's   
   > to be demonstrated.   
   >    
   > > temporarily inhabiting a physical house   
   > >of clay [after having entered it through the soft-spot of the head,   
   > >again according to The Edgar Cayce Readings (and sounds right to me)] -   
   > >is that when the brain was stimulated and mapped, the researchers    
   > >could, for example, make the person's arm move, BUT THEY COULD NOT   
   > >MAKE THE PERSON *WANT* TO MOVE THEIR ARM! AHA! TO WHAT BELONGS THE   
   > >WILL?    
   >    
   > Depends on why they're moving their arm.  If they're hungry, they may   
   > be lifting it to eat.  If they're angry, they may  be raising their   
   > hand to beat the crap out of someone -- and if they're the *other   
   > person* in this situation, they may be raising their hand to deflect   
   > the blow!   
   >    
   > >ACCORDING THUS TO SCIENCES' RESEARCHERS NOT THE BRAIN! SO ANY   
   > >PERSON WHO SAYS THAT ALL THERE IS IS THE BRAIN AND THAT EVERYTHING   
   > >DERIVES AND ARISES FROM THE BRAIN HAS TO GO BACK TO SQUARE ONE!   
   >    
   > No, there's always a biological or psychological reason for why people   
   > get up move around.  So science marches on, as successful as it's ever   
   > been.   
      
   Sorry that, apparently, nothing that I said meant anything new or valid   
   to you.   
      
   Sorry too, that I just do not have the time to respond to everything you   
   have said here AND it seems to me at this point that there would be no   
   point to anyway - you definitely have your own ideas and your mind is   
   set.   
      
   I did mean to include the following link to my article about intuition,   
   which examples of do not fit your explanation above. I guess I will   
   include it here, but looks like probably for no good reason   
      
   https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/alt.anagrams/HB8goIMh3F0    
      
   Wishing you all the best in your journey.   
      
   Debra Dee Freeman   
   --   
   P.S. In the twenty years that I have lived in Virginia Beach, VA,   
   I have only attended a conference at the A.R.E. one time. I am    
   not into their conferences, nor do I ever know what they are,   
   unless I find out by happenstance, which was the case regarding   
   the one that I attended. I go to the A.R.E. for numerous other   
   reasons, and it is always a joy for me to be there - the place   
   is so great. Maybe you are not aware, but there are many many   
   other things and activities at the A.R.E. than their conferences   
   AND their conferences are only held like once a month or something.    
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca