From: dfreemans@live.com   
      
   I called aol 800-827-6364 and filed a complaint that Vincent Maycock   
   is abusing his email account with them.   
      
   If the abuse continues, hopefully they will kill his account, or else kill   
   it for the abuse that he has already commit, ergo:   
      
   On Nov 30 2014 I wrote (at talk.origins post "Origin? ~ Go: "INRI!")   
      
   TIS IN ARCH ~   
   CHRISTIAN? ~   
   RICH SAINT ~   
   INRI, CHATS.   
      
   On Dec 02 2014 he "replied"   
      
   How about   
      
   RICH STAIN   
      
   AIR SNITCH   
      
   and   
      
   NIT'S CHAIR   
      
   See at   
   https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/talk.origins/qEvTzafVSIY   
   5B26-50-false%5D   
      
   **********   
      
   On Nov 30 2014 I wrote (at alt.anagrams post "He is risen ~ in his seer.")   
      
   HE IS RISEN ~   
   IN HIS SEER.   
      
   On Dec 02 2014 he "replied"   
      
   No, Debra, it's more like you say to you describe yourself regarding   
   the risen Lord as,   
      
   I, HIS SNEER;   
      
   then you say to yourself,   
      
   I ... SHEER SIN!   
      
   and   
      
   How about   
      
   Would someone please find a way to   
      
   FREE MEAN, DRAB DEE?   
      
   or   
      
   DEBRA DEE FREEMAN:   
      
   a really   
      
   MEAN BREAD-FEEDER   
      
   and   
      
   A summary of my main problems with Debra would be:   
      
   a)  her interest in and respect for the famous quack and charlatan,   
   Edgar Cayce   
      
   b) possible interest in the nonsense of reincarnation   
      
   and   
      
   d)  I think Debra might have drifted into the nonsense of believing   
   there is "meaning" latent in some anagrams, independent of the meaning   
   that human anagrammers deliberately put there, although I'm not sure   
   that she's always consistent in her views on this matter   
      
   e)  she may be confused about the meaning of the word "transposition,"   
   and evidently uses it for any anagram that she doesn't like, which is   
   no at correct usage of the word "transposition"   
      
   Debra's lone redeeming trait that I am aware of is her interest in   
   anagramming.   
      
   and   
      
   I don't know about eat-shit hate-ism, but it should be clear to   
   rational people that God does not actually exist, any more than   
   leprechauns or Harry Potter do.   
      
   Of course, I'm not sure how much difference that's going to make to   
   someone who *also* swallows bullshit like Edgar Cayce and ends her   
   posts with the word "amen," like a lunatic praying to herself.   
      
   I don't know.  Maybe you *do* believe that Harry Potter is real, but   
   wouldn't if you would just take your damn meds like your psychiatrist   
   told you to.   
      
   and   
      
   You seem to have shot yourself in the foot there, idiot.  ATHEIST and   
   A THEIST *are the same damn* letter sequence!   
      
   What fucking difference does it make whether you get good or bad   
   anagrams out of this letter sequence, (i.e., whether you're  "a ...   
   theist, who believes in God," or "an atheist, who is able to   
   understand that obviously, God does not exist.")   
      
   See at   
   https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/alt.anagrams/TFbAjmarTIU   
   5B26-50-false%5D   
      
   **********   
      
   On Dec 03 2014 I wrote (at alt.anagrams post "Origin? ~ Go: "INRI!")   
      
   ORIGIN? ~   
      
   GO: "INRI!"   
      
   The Holy Bible and The Edgar Cayce Readings tell us that the soul last   
   incarnate as Jesus had formerly been incarnate as Adam, the origin of every   
   other human being on this planet since that time and so therefore also all   
   of their words, actions, creations.   
      
   This one word and one anagram concisely and exquisitely corroborate these   
   two sources of information.   
      
   --   
      
   ORIGINS? ~   
      
   SIGNORI!  [lords, sirs, misters, males]   
      
   This anagram also parallels the information in The Holy Bible and   
   The Edgar Cayce Readings that the creation of Adam was an agreed-upon   
   venture between 1. an Etheric Soul named Amilius, who was lastly   
   incarnate as the Lord Jesus, and 2. the Lord Yahweh.   
      
   [Thanks to talk.origins "Burkhard" for this one.]   
      
   --   
      
   AND THE ORIGIN OF HUMANKIND? ~   
   O! EH! THINK GOD, ADAM (INRI), N FUN!   
   UH, THINK GOD, N ADAM (INRI), N FOE!   
      
   On Dec 06 2014 he "replied"   
      
   There has been some question about the quality of Debra's anagrams.   
   Now, I'm sure that the best anagrammers should be producing anagrams   
   of literary quality so high that they wouldn't be out of place in a   
   well-written novel, but we're not going to hold Debra to a standard   
   that high.   
      
   Instead, we're going to ask: Are there some of her anagrams that make   
   absolutely no sense?  Then, after that question is answered, maybe   
   questions about the exact nature of the literary quality of her other   
   anagrams can be addressed.   
      
   We'll look at two anagrams of the  phrase below and then another   
   anagram from another one of her posts: (remember, we're using low,   
   *low* standards to begin with):   
      
   >AND THE ORIGIN OF HUMANKIND? ~   
      
   which she first anagrammed to:   
      
   >O! EH! THINK GOD, ADAM (INRI), N FUN!   
      
   Although at first glance this anagram may appear to be a butchering of   
   the English language beyond all recognition, the use of appropriate   
   punctuation allows us to cast it into a form that meets our low   
   standards for Debra at this point.  Something like:   
      
   OH, EH! THINK, "GOD, ADAM, 'N' INRI = FUN!"   
      
   Notice that I've fixed Debra's conflation of Adam with Jesus Christ,   
   that is to say,  INRI.  These are two different Biblical characters,   
   so we don't refer to one as a parenthetical version of the other.   
      
   I should also point out that I don't do anything beyond a total letter   
   count to validate these anagrams in terms of meeting the definition of   
   an anagram.  I can't be responsible, in any of my  improvements on   
   Debra's anagrams, for errors on her part relating to the number of   
   times a given letter appears in her anagrams relative to the phrase   
   she started with.   
      
   >UH, THINK GOD, N ADAM (INRI), N FOE!   
      
   In order to rescue this literary monstrosity, we need to allow   
   ourselves the latitude of some misspellings, because remember we're   
   using low standards for Debra.  I'm going to redact this anagram so   
   that it reads:   
      
   OH, ENUF! THINK:" GOD, ADAM, 'N' INRI!"   
      
   We'll look at one more Freeman letter sequence rearrangement (or   
   "anagram," if we're in a charitable mood), and that will conclude our   
   literary analysis of her work for today, namely one that starts with   
   the phrase:   
      
   DEBRA DEE FREEMAN'S POSTINGS? ~   
      
   First of all, the tildes are unnecessary.  If they're supposed to be   
   some kind of literary or poetic decoration, that's fine, but she   
   really needs to make this clear, rather than leaving the impression   
   that she's a confused and idiosyncratic person who defaces her own   
   postings, as in something like,   
      
   DEBRA @DEE FREEMAN'S %%POSTINGS?~ .    .   
      
   by accident or something.   
      
   Now, as I understand it, the tilde can also mean a continuation   
   anagram is to come, but that's even worse, since the sequence of   
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)