Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.anagrams    |    Creative manipulation of English words?    |    19,138 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 18,071 of 19,138    |
|    Debra Dee McQueen Freeman to All    |
|    Re: MY POSTINGS AT EDGARCAYCE.ORG -- (68    |
|    13 Aug 16 22:30:38    |
      [continued from previous message]              greatest among you is servant of all." When shall ye be free       from same? When ye have attained, when ye have gained that next       step that He may say, "Move on, now; that thy children, those ye       have taught, may carry on. Ye are called to the greater service       of making known again - by word of mouth or by the pen - the       greater lessons of Truth." So WHERE is such a contribution of       her's this time around? And WHERE does she think Truth resides?       In channeled materials such as A Course In Miracles? In Eastern       Thought? In Pop Philosophies? In strange extra-biblical writings       such as The Gospel of Thomas [which she said of herself she had       read and found meaning in, even allowed herself to be troubled by       a portion of, but which portion that is she "is not at liberty" to tell us]?       Or The Holy Bible which The Edgar Cayce Readings say contains Truth       and is the best parallel to the Readings themself? And has she read       my postings at this Forum - which all can be easily accessed by typing       "Debra Dee Freeman" in the upper-right search-field at the website       EdgarCayce.Org and then clicking on each of the results that come up -       and WHAT does she think of my presentations of Truth and Prophecy       therein?              Yes, I myself am most interested to hear from her further, and       hopefully she will have more to tell us than just that she was       supposedly formerly incarnate as Judy the Essene, including       what Reading or Readings say that reincarnate Essenes are       supposed to be the preparers for the second coming of Jesus       AND that as a group they are to have just one leader [until       and unless then, of course, these are just her own ideas].              Debra Dee Freeman       --       P.S. I also have a big problem with her statement that because two       A.R.E. employees gave her the funds to make one of her moves her       "faith in the A.R.E. was restored". I hardly think that anyone should       base their opinion of the A.R.E. on the actions or inactions of one or       two or a few of its employees (whether paid or volunteer). Additionally,       the A.R.E. is not, and was not founded to be, a philanthropic organization       but an educational association to maintain and disseminate the information       in the Readings and those materials that are similar to and coordinate with       the Readings:              254-37-8 "The purpose, then, of the Association: The institution is to be       built around that of a place where the records of that accomplished through       these sources are kept, and others of similar nature, or of the various       philosophies that may be found that will coordinate - and combined in that       oneness of purpose to bring the better understanding of the purpose IN       life, and thus enable man to realize the closer association with the divine."              **********              January 2, 2016              J.R. replied:              Happy New Year to Debra and all. I never met Miss Mae but she did appear       to be a strange bird per Debra's description. People are paid to work at ARE,       I've had two friends on staff, one told me the pay was substantial (roughly       around 70 k/year circa 1995). In today's dollars that well into a six figure       salary inflation adjusted. I can't verify that was true but he did make that       claim. The other person was paid minimum wage, or a little more, as a book       store worker and clerk. My well paid friend was married to an ARE former       board member and major player in the organization, although he was       virtually destitute when he showed up at ARE's doorstep.              As always, I must separate the Cayce readings from the goings on at the       ARE. At times the ARE has acted in ways that are inconsistent with       spirituality. In most cases, its best to go to the source rather than accept       second hand opinions and beliefs, or base opinions concerning Cayce on the       behavior of the staff. As we know, Cayce has been New Aged, and in my       view, that isn't consistent with the original intent of the readings.              David Wilcox never impressed me as Cayce like. I never met the gentleman,       but his persona seems full of himself. Humility, was always emphasized by       Edgar and Mr. Wilcox seems devoid of this admirable trait.              My wife and I will be attending ARE's June congress, anyone friend or foe,       please say hello.              **********              January 03, 2016              Debra replied:              Hey again J.R.:              Thank you for your good and timely reply.              **********              January 17, 2016              Debra replied:              Judi Aherns wrote on January 15 2016:              "I'm back to continue my story, but after discovering that my story       has offended one reader, I've decided it is best to keep my story       to myself. As far as the first posting goes, I thought I had deleted       it and nobody would ever see it. The posting on Dec. 31 was my       story from the beginning which would have included what was       related in the posting on the 30th. Being a perfectionist at heart,       I thought it best to tell my story from the beginning. I really       intended no harm in the telling of my story and I honestly thought       when I pressed the delete button, that it did so. I will find another       avenue to relate my story. I wish to thank you J.R. for your kind       remark and wish you the best for the new year. Perhaps you could       share your own story with me, I'd love to read it. Peace be with Thee."                      "Has offended one reader"? A. I was not offended by your story and       I never said that I was offended by your story; B. You have no idea how       many readers were offended by your story; C. I did say that I was most       interested to hear from you further and for you to provide for us where it       says in the Readings that reincarnate Essenes were to prepare the world       for the second coming of Jesus and that they were to have just one leader;       now that you have used me and my knowledgeable thoughtful accurate       reply as an excuse to bail-out and not provide that information I am       indeed offended and for the sake of the entire Forum and for everyone       reading it. Especially since you supposedly did thorough research for       years in regards to Essene-related information in the Readings: If such       information exists in the Readings it should be easiest of all for you to       share same with us.              "As far as the first posting goes, I thought I had deleted it and nobody       would ever see it. The posting on Dec. 31 was my story from the       beginning which would have included what was related in the posting on       the 30th"? WOW! A. When you clicked-on "Post" December 30 2015 that       text was not only archived but it was sent to the email account address       of every Forum member who has their Forum membership so configured;       B. Your December 31 2015 text DID NOT contain what was related in your       December 30 2015 text as a comparison between your December 31 2015       text and my January 01 2016 reply clearly shows. Your December 31 2015       text left out numerous statements and several entire subjects that were in       your December 30 2015 text.              "Being a perfectionist at heart, I thought it best to tell my story from       the beginning. I really intended no harm in the telling of my story and I       honestly thought when I pressed the delete button, that it did so."? A. Ha!       A perfectionist would have thoroughly thought-out what they should say       AND THEN have posted that text. A perfectionist would not have posted       inappropriate lengthy text and then - according to what you have now said       and/or suggested to us - have IMMEDIATELY pressed the "Delete" button       to remove it and so for this reason been left thinking that no one ever saw       it, let alone less than 24 hours later to have posted another lengthy text              [continued in next message]              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca