From: jpewther@aol.com   
      
   I haven't been anagramming lately, but I noticed that there were no anagrams   
   posted here for Judge Kavanaugh, who has been a major topic in the news here   
   in the USA. However, a quick Google search revealed that some fellow named Rob   
   Beschizza posted a    
   good and apropos anagram of "Brett Kavanaugh" on Twitter.  I could just show   
   you his anagram, he probably wouldn't mind. But to be perfectly respectful of   
   his copyright, perhaps I should just give you a link to his tweet:   
   https://twitter.com/Beschizza/status/1043147511811239936   
      
   Anyway, after seeing that anagram, I am further swayed by the accusations of   
   the three women who have accused Brett Kavanaugh of doing stupid, violent,   
   sexist things when he was a young man and got drunk. Maybe Kavanaugh has a   
   Jekyll and Hyde personality,   
    and when he gets drunk, Mr. Hyde takes over.   
      
   By the way, what do you people at alt.anagrams think of the claim that an   
   anagrammer has a copyright on each of his/her anagrams discoveries? And to   
   what extent are other people allowed to quote them, or claim them as their   
   own, without permission from    
   the author?   
      
   I might add that some fellow who identifies himself as "Brad Holland MD FACS"   
   posted a reply to Rob Beshizza's tweet, showing two anagrams of Rob's name.   
   Both his anagrams were meaningless gibberish in my estimation, proving to me   
   that Brad Holland is a    
   complete moron, even if he does have the fancy title MD FACS after his name.   
   Believe me, I would never go to this guy for a surgery, and I would warn my   
   friends that he is a moron.   
      
   Jud   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)