XPost: alt.society.liberalism   
   From: matttelles@sprynet.com   
      
   Dänk 42Ø  wrote in   
   news:S4KdnfOlRfeNNjTNnZ2dnUVZ_tudnZ2d@earthlink.com:   
      
   > On Mon, 19 Nov 2012 00:33:16 +0000, Matt wrote:   
   >   
   >> Bert  wrote in news:XnsA10F91C678480VeebleFetzer@   
   >> 216.250.188.141:   
   >>   
   >>> In news:XnsA10F86CD3A7D7matttellessprynetcom@88.198.244.100 Matt   
   >>>  wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>> Bert  wrote in news:XnsA10F71397ED23VeebleFetzer@   
   >>>> 216.250.188.141:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>> In news:k8avs0$3mt$2@reader1.panix.com Xox    
   >>>>> wrote:   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>> Anonymous sabotaged or blocked these functions.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> While making absolutely no changes of their own?   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> Really?   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> You believe this crap?   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>> Are you saying that the election machines can be hacked?   
   >>>   
   >>> No, but the other poster certainly was.   
   >>   
   >> Then certainly, there is nothing to worry about, right?   
   >>   
   >> Never mind that the voting machines can be hacked easily, as shown by   
   >> a number of independents.   
   >>   
   >> Electronic voting is safe, and Republicans simply can't win on their   
   >> own merits.   
   >   
   > Electronic voting is *NOT* safe, and leftards like you have said so   
   > repeatedly in the past.  The only difference now is that Democrats   
   > outrigged the Republican rigging.   
      
   Ahhh, so it ISN'T safe.   
      
   Then why are you backing it?   
      
   Matt   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)