Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.anarchism    |    Ohh another whinefest about "the system"    |    74,797 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 72,851 of 74,797    |
|    Anarcissie to All    |
|    Re: How Sandy 'Saved' Occupy    |
|    02 Dec 12 00:37:52    |
      XPost: talk.politics.misc, talk.politics.libertarian, alt.society.liberalism       XPost: alt.politics.radical-left       From: anarcissie@gmail.com              On Sat, 01 Dec 2012 18:39:53 +0000, Dänk 42Ø wrote:              > On 12/01/2012 03:52 AM, Anarcissie wrote:       >> On Wed, 28 Nov 2012 17:20:36 +0000, Dänk 42Ø wrote:       >>       >>> On 11/28/2012 03:10 PM, Xox wrote:       >>>> How Sandy Saved Occupy       >>>>       >>>> [35]Sharon Lerner       >>>>       >>>> November 27, 2012 ...       >>>> Occupy Sandy's story began in the hours just after the       >>>> superstorm hit, when "a few of us occupiers were just texting       >>>> each other at like 2 a.m.       >>>> ...       >>>> Four adrenaline- and caffeine-fueled weeks later...       >>>       >>> Most Occupytards have no jobs, given that they seem to have infinite       >>> amounts of free time to protest, so who is paying for their iPhones       >>> and lattes? And since they are supposedly protesting against       >>> corporate greed, aren't Apple and Starbucks corporations, and didn't       >>> Steve Jobs die a billionaire?       >>       >> I think you're behind the times there. The reality is more interesting       >> that these old cliche's. Indeed,       >> reality may be the NBT.       >       > What I'm saying is that they appear to be professional protesters.       > Someone is feeding them and paying their iPhone bills, so who? Not that       > there is anything illegal about being paid to "protest" -- it is a       > paying job just like any other -- but then we must assume that their       > opinions are those of their employer, and we have a right to know who       > that is.              Actually, if I'm up on my Supreme Court decisions, I       don't think you do have such a right. However, I'm       going to tell you all about it anyway.              I don't know about 'professional' in the usual sense.       The kind of activists I know are pretty cheap to support.       Often, they support themselves with part-time crap jobs.       Others live what might be called the student life. If you       don't have children, a mortgage, and so on, you can live       rather cheaply if not very luxuriously, couchsurfing, house-       sitting, staying in squats or in a van. Yet       others are retired from regular jobs or are living on       disability payments. Also, a lot of people are willing       to contribute to activism even though they don't want to       or are unable to participate directly. These may be       relatives or friends of the activists rather than an       organization. Occupy Wall Street collected buckets of       money, literally, from passers-by during their brief       career in Zucotti Park.              Of course there are also formal organizations with       offices and employees and enrolled members, too, but as       far as I know they are out in the open, at least the       leftish ones seem to be. I am less familiar with       right-wing activism.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca