home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   alt.anarchism      Ohh another whinefest about "the system"      74,797 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 72,959 of 74,797   
   MattB . to dank@420.org   
   Re: Privacy vs national security: spy ca   
   08 Jun 13 00:46:05   
   
   XPost: alt.politics.liberalism, alt.society.liberalism, alt.poli   
   ics.usa.republican   
   XPost: alt.politics.democrats   
   From: trdell1234@spamnogmail.com   
      
   On Sat, 08 Jun 2013 00:26:34 -0500, Dänk 42Ø  wrote:   
      
   >On Fri, 07 Jun 2013 15:05:35 -0600, Yoorghis quacked:   
   >   
   >> On Fri, 07 Jun 2013 11:41:55 -0700, MattB .    
   >> wrote:   
   >>   
   >>>Privacy vs national security: spy cases rekindle debate   
   >>   
   >> You mean the ON-GOING Bush Policy---Voted in TWICE by republicans that   
   >> was known of by all intel committees?   
   >   
   >Didn't Chairman Obama run on a promise to Change this sort of fascist   
   >corruption?   
   >   
   >It is true that many Americans who are condemning Chairman Obama for   
   >operating the same unconstitutional wiretap program as Emperor Bush are   
   >rightarded Republicans, but not all.   
   >   
   >I was so outraged over Bush's felony violation of the FISA law that I   
   >voted for Democraps in 2006 in the deluded beLIEf they would keep their   
   >promise to impeach the fucker if they won control of Congress.  They won,   
   >and promptly moved impeachment off the table to make room for a farm   
   >subsidy bill to help good Christian family farmers like Monsanto.  So   
   >they lost my support forever.   
   >   
   >As usual, a leftard tries to defend the corruption of his precious   
   >Democrap Party by pointing out that Republicans are corrupt, too.  That   
   >Hitler is also a genocidal maniac somehow justifies the genocidal maniacy   
   >of Stalin.  This is the entire extent of their so-called ideology, that   
   >two wrongs somehow make a right (left?).   
   >   
   >But I will concede that Yoorghis is correct in condemning former Bushtards   
   >for their hypocrisy.  Remember that these are the pseudo-patriotic jerks   
   >who cheered Emperor Bush as he wiped his ass with the Constitution, and   
   >now suddenly act outraged that Chairman Obama is flushing the soiled   
   >shreds down the toilet.  But Obamatards must also be condemned for   
   >bleating unquestioning support for unconstitutional policies they opposed   
   >when Emperor Bush was in power.   
      
   Many republicans or Conservatives did consider what Bush did as wrong.   
   Yoorghis thinks all Republicans agree 100% with what Bush did he is   
   very wrong.   
      
   I know many Democrats that are unhappy with Obama on several issues.   
   Think the Democrats have last votes because of Obama corruption.   
      
   >   
   >Chairman Obama should actually be commended for giving a burial, if even   
   >an indecent one in the sewers, to a document that he and his predecessor   
   >so brutally sodomized.  If America is going to be a fascist dictatorship   
   >from now on, let us at least acknowledge that this is what our country   
   >has become, rather than masturbating on a Chinese-made American flag as   
   >we fantasize that we are still "free."   
      
   Now Now.  Comrade Obama doesn't have doctorial powers yet.  He first   
   had to silence the press.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca