XPost: alt.society.anarchy, alt.politics.radical-left   
   From: etacx18@etaoin.com   
      
   On Tue, 22 Jul 2014 21:31:32 +0000, Bert wrote:   
      
   > In news:lqhqfa$4oo$1@reader1.panix.com Xox  wrote:   
   >   
   >> To cut through all the propaganda and the fog of war,   
   >> the question you want to ask about the Maylaysian airliner is   
   >> 'Who benefits from the shooting down of a Maylaysian airliner?'   
   >   
   > No. The question is "Who benefits from shooting down a Ukranian military   
   > cargo plane?"   
   >   
   > That's what the Russians thought they were shooting at.   
      
   Did anyone give verifiable evidence of that?  So far all I   
   have seen from all concerned parties has been propaganda.   
   The US is now saying the Russians / Putin 'created the   
   conditions' that led to the shooting, that is, the war in   
   the eastern parts of Ukraine, which sounds like they're   
   already walking back the various claims they made previously.   
   If we're talking about the war, the US certainly had a share   
   in 'creating the conditions.'   
      
   However, what I would really like to know is why a civilian   
   airliner from far away was flying over a war zone in the   
   first place.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)