Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.anime    |    Japanese Anime and Hentai worship    |    1,634 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 518 of 1,634    |
|    Raheman Velji to All    |
|    transportation revolution at hand (3/5)    |
|    10 Nov 04 18:52:29    |
      [continued from previous message]              to the wire, and if a current is set up in the wire coil, then the       wire coil will either move forward or backward. This could be applied       to the Simple Newton Engine. The wire coil would be the "piston" and       the magnets would be part of the "cylinder".                     --------------------------------------------------       It should be noted that the Simple Newton Engine creates a small       amount of force for a relatively minute amount of time. In my mind,       it would only be effective if many are used simultaneously. For       example, I imagine that it wouldn't be too hard for the Simple Newton       Engine to have a burst of 5N for a tenth of a second. Building a unit       of ten thousand of such Newton engines would create a combined force       of 5000N, assuming that the engines can "reload" in 0.9 seconds. The       real problem is getting a good force-to-mass ratio (acceleration); if       you can get acceleration greater than 10 m/sē then you can pretty much       launch any vehicle, no matter how massive, into space. If the vehicle       is too massive, then all you need to do is add more individual engines       to the unit, and eventually it should lift off the ground. If such       high accelerations cannot be made, then I'm sure this invention can       compete with ion propulsion.              -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-       =-=-=-3) The Gravitational-density Dynamo-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=       -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-              Here is the general idea of the Gravitational-density Dynamo:              First, an object (the object could be a liquid) on the ground is       inserted into a tall tube which contains a fluid which is more dense       than the object. Also, the object should be insoluble in the fluid.       Due to the density difference, the submerged object is displaced       upwards. When the object reaches the top, it is removed from the tube       and is dropped. Due to the force of gravity, it will fall. The       energy of the falling object will somehow be harnessed to create       electricity. Once the object has reached the ground, it must be       reinserted back into the tube to repeat the process. (Notice that the       tube should be as tall as possible so as to maximize the amount of       energy of the object when it falls.)              When I first conceived this idea I figured the object would be a log       of wood, and the fluid would be water. In the following section, I       will examine a Gravitational-density Dynamo that uses water as the       object and perfluorooctane as the fluid.              -\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-       -|-|-| (2) LAW OF CONSERVATION OF ENERGY |-|-|-|-|-|-|-|-|-|-|-|-       -/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-                     ---------------------------------------        Here is a specific, and perhaps practical, version of the       Gravitational-density dynamo. (The workings of the       Gravitational-density dynamo was described in the previous section.)                      _________________________        | |       semi- __\ |___ _________________ |       permeable / | | | |       material | |        (dialysis | | |        tubing) | | |        | | |        | | ------*------ <--\        | | | |        | | | turbine        | | |        tube B --> | |        (contains | | | |        perfluoro- | | | |        octane) | | | |        | | | | <-- tube A        | | | | (contains        | |_________________| | water)        | | |        |____________|____________|               /|\        \_ semi-permeable        material        (dialysis        tubing)                      Tube A contains water. Tube B contains perfluorooctane. Tube A       and tube B are connected to each other by dialysis tubing, which is a       semi-permeable material. Water can permeate through the dialysis       tubing, but perfluorooctane can't. Due to osmotic pressure, the water       in tube A will pass through the dialysis tubing entering tube B.       Since perfluorooctane is insoluble in water, and since water is less       dense than perfluorooctane, the water will rise to the top of tube B.       The water that has risen will permeate through the dialysis tubing at       the top of tube B. Once enough water has accumulated at the top of       tube B, it will fall, turning the turbine, and returning back into       tube A.               Notice that this dynamo didn't require any input energy, and it       will continue to work, creating electricity by turning the turbine       (and generator, which is not shown), so long as the perfluorooctane       does not seep into tube A through the semi-permeable material.       Eventually, the perfluorooctane will seep through the dialysis tubing,       and so, this invention is not a perpetual motion machine.               But how can this dynamo generate electricity without any input       energy? First, let's observe that the water at the top of tube B has       a gravitational potential energy. When it falls, the gravitational       potential energy is realized and is converted into electricity by the       turbine (and generator, which is not shown). But how did the water       initially get its gravitational potential energy? It got its       gravitational potential energy from being displaced in a fluid       (perfluorooctane) that is more dense than it. Thus, we must conclude       that insoluble objects in fluids that are more dense gain       gravitational potential energy by being displaced upwards. However,       where is that energy coming from? By the Law of Conservation of       Energy, something must lose energy so that another can gain energy.       Since we cannot find anything losing energy, we must conclude that the       Law of Conservation of Energy is wrong, and that gravity creates       forces which then create/destroy energy; in this case it created       energy in the final form of electricity.               Energy is being created/destroyed all around us. Gravity and       magnetism are prime examples. Both create forces. The immediate       effect of the forces on the system is nothing (the vectors of the       forces cancel each other out). However, after the immediate effect,       and after a minute amount of real time, the forces will do work on the       system. If "positive work" is done, then the system will gain energy.        If "negative work" is done, then the system will lose energy.       Whether energy seems to be added to the system or removed depends on       your inertial frame of reference. Should these forces be sustained       for a longer duration of real time, then the forces might be found to       have not done any work on the system (that is, it added the same       amount of energy that was removed).              ---------------------------------------        Suppose we have two magnets with like-charges "q" and "q0". The       space between the two charges is "r". Let the potential energy       between the charges be "U". So,               1 q*q0        U = ------ ------        4*pi*E r              where pi = 3.14        E is the permittivity of free space               As the two magnets are moved closer to each other, potential       energy will be gained and kinitic energy will be lost. As the two       magnets move away from each other, potential energy will be lost and              [continued in next message]              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca