XPost: alt.planning.urban   
   From: Amy_nospam@magnoliamultimedia.com   
      
   "Kris Krieger"  wrote in message   
   news:13rndpbg8n87i12@corp.supernews.com...   
   > "Amy Blankenship"  wrote in   
   > news:opNuj.102514$K27.76739@bignews6.bellsouth.net:   
   >   
   >>   
   >> "Kris Krieger"  wrote in message   
   >> news:13rmpq5mud3k707@corp.supernews.com...   
   >>> "Amy Blankenship"  wrote in   
   >>> news:bzHuj.90050$rc2.28057@bignews1.bellsouth.net:   
   >>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>> "Kris Krieger"  wrote in message   
   >>>> news:13rmf23q5mtv2ef@corp.supernews.com...   
   >>>>   
   >>>>>> What I'm saying is that if you're going to post that you have no   
   >>>>>> concern that the choices you make degrade the air quality of   
   >>>>>> others, if you then post a few hours later complaining that others   
   >>>>>> are degrading your air quality, you're a hypocrite.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> INfectiou agents are not identical to air quality.  Whatever your   
   >>>>> problem is with DOn, it's just that the two things are different,   
   >>>>> apples'n'oranges so to speak.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> That's like saying "I don't mind if my children run around and   
   >>>> destroy people's property.  Damn, it's disgusting how people let   
   >>>> their dogs run loose and they get in my trash.  What?  You're   
   >>>> criticizing me because I let my kids destroy property and then turn   
   >>>> around and criticize others for letting their dogs be destructive?   
   >>>> Dogs and children are two different things, apples and oranges so to   
   >>>> speak."   
   >>>   
   >>> No, Amy, what I said as that infectious agents are not identical to   
   >>> air quality.  Air pollution causes damage in certain ways, infection   
   >>> causes damage in other ways.  It is not at all like your "analogy",   
   >>> which has no relevance whatsoever to the mere fact that I stated.   
   >>> WHatever *your* problem is with Don, the two things are still   
   >>> different.   
   >>   
   >> THat kind of crap.  It's like the hyena's butthole calling the rhino's   
   >> butthole stinky - differnt animal, differnt diet, maybe a differnt   
   >> stink, but a stink nonetheless.   
   >>   
   >> ;-)   
   >>   
   >>   
   >   
   > THat was written because of someone else's carrying on about dung, and   
   > who is dung, and whose ideas are dung, and whatever the hell else.  THat   
   > had nothing whatsoever with the simple fact hat I related.  If you want   
   > to reject facts, remain in ignorance, and throw something back at me that   
   > is in no way related to my mention of a simple fact, fine, that's your   
   > right, just as it's my right to stop bothering with your posts, if that   
   > is how you're going to choose to behave.   
      
   Oh gosh.  I'm crushed.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)