From: user@domain.invalid   
      
   Don wrote:   
   > "Warm Worm"  wrote in message   
   >>>>>>>>> There's a guy named Radley Balko thats making a living of charting   
   >>>>>>>>> this stuff out, derelict police altercations with innocent people.   
   >>>>>>>>> Have you seen that fatass cop, Riviero or something?   
   >>>>>>>>> There's 2 different ones floating around the web about him   
   >>>>>>>>> A total dik, fat, big mouth and an addiction to picking on people   
   >>>>>>>>> smaller than himself, which is just about everyone.   
   >>>>>>>>> A year or 2 in the state shitcan is the prescription for asswipes   
   >>>>>>>>> like that.   
   >>>>>>>> The _state_ shitcan? How about a freemarket private police system   
   >>>>>>>> with nothing/no one to answer to?   
   >>>>>>> Why change the rules halfway into the game?   
   >>>>>>> He works for the state so he can be punished by the state.   
   >>>>>>> Overall though I agree with the sentiment.   
   >>>>>>> Abolish the state, turn all incarcerations over to private entities   
   >>>>>>> and let them figure it out.   
   >>>>>>> We'd all be better off.   
   >>>>>> Exactly: We could properly take care of that woman without the hassle   
   >>>>>> of videos, public cops, public scrutiny, freedom of info, state   
   >>>>>> shitcans, or anyone knowing anything about anyone's business in that   
   >>>>>> case or any other. People should do 100% what they want. ;D   
   >>>>> You keep saying *we* and I don't see how that figures into it.   
   >>>> But you just said, "We'd all be better off."   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Make up your mind.   
    >>>   
   >>> ???   
   >>> I think we'd be better off without a tyrannical monopoly on force, and   
   >>> from that you transpose that we should take care of people?   
   >>> Amazing.   
   >> The thing is I don't think you have a handle on how we'd all be better   
   >> off.   
   >   
   > What you really mean is *Don has not explained to me how I would be better   
   > off if thugs weren't running loose beating peoples asses left and right, and   
   > even though they have not yet beaten my ass I hope beyond hope that they   
   > don't beat my ass, so therefore Don's silly illusion is just that. Now what   
   > time does Oprah come on again?*   
   >   
   > Look Richard, I don't have all the answers and I don't know the cure but   
   > when I point out massive instances of certain groups of people abusing other   
   > people you should look to yourself as to how to deal with such things. Its   
   > YOUR life and you should run it as YOU see fit.   
      
   Look Don, you're talking about _we_ to _us_. Make up your mind.   
   You're shittin' in reverse.   
      
   > I find problems and I try to find solutions, overall and direct.   
      
   Knock yourself out.   
      
   > For me, I removed myself from the types of areas where these violent   
   > confrontations with state hired, bald headed, steroid pumped, abused as   
   > children, punks happen most frequently.   
   >   
   > I think you are being intentionally argumentative and bringing nothing to   
   > the table.   
      
   You're wanking tabloid shit on alt.architecture.   
      
   > AND, you're doing the Amy trick, confusing apples with oranges.   
   > Frankly, she's better at it than you.   
      
   I, and probably Amy, don't give a flying fuck.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)