Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.architecture    |    Meh, modern architecture kinda sucks    |    32,393 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 31,411 of 32,393    |
|    Don to Pat    |
|    Re: PMI    |
|    12 May 08 07:43:30    |
      386d58d9       From: one-if-by-land@concord.com              "Pat"> wrote       > "Don"> wrote:       > Sitting here churning out a set of construction drawings and my mind       > wanders       > as its want to do and I thought about all these home mortgages in default       > across the fruited plain.       > By extension I wondered why the lenders were in dire straits if PMI       > (private       > mortgage insurance) was there as a buffer.       > I pulled my real estate books and perused but could not find a reference       > that PMI was required by law.       > (I'm aware of the 20% / 1 yr rule)       > So I emailed a real broker friend and asked him if PMI is required by law.       > He told me PMI is not required by law and is applied at the lenders       > discretion.       > Further, subprime loans rarely require PMI.       > Say what???       > The loans MOST likely to default do not have the safeguard of PMI.       > This is like a cruise ship with a bunch of holes in the bottom setting to       > sea with no lifeboats.              All mortgages aren't the same. If you've got PMI, it is a "prime       mortgage" that meets certain underwriting criteria that allows it to       be easily sold in the secondary market. This is the world of Fannie       and Freddie. The problem is the underwriting standards. Most require       20% to 10% equity (80% or 90% LTV), an appraisal, income documentation       and there are caps on the amount of the loans. If you are over the       cap, you are a "jumbo" mortgage. In places like California, almost       all mortgages are "jumbos". From there, it went downhill.              These subprime mortgage bear a higher rate. Bank buy and sell blocks       of them. They buy if they need a return (investment) and they sell       when they need liquidity. That's the problem. They are now       discounting the heck of these morgages to compensate for losses. Say       you are a bank and you are worth a billion dollars. Say you are       required to keep 10% equity (say $100 million). Say you have $40       million in subprimes and they are devalued to $30 million. You need       to find $10 million in equity --FAST. But who wants to invest in you       because you just lost your but in the subprime market. Now you're       facing duel problems of equity and liquidity.       +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++              Well yeah Pat, that was my point.       Prime and Jumbo's aren't the problem, because the borrowers in those groups       have proven through past experience that they have the means and discipline       to carry the thing through, yet they are still required to have PMI until a       predesignated amount of the loan has been paid.       Prime and Jumbo's aren't defaulting to the degree that Subprimes are.       People with Subprime loans weren't required to put down the higher       downpayment and received higher loan to value mortgages inspite of their       record of having worse credit experience.       Thats why I was sort of amazed that such a condition was allowed to happen.       Given that, its no surprise that it did happen.       However, a link that Rico provided awhile back gave some insight as to how       this happened and Eliot Spitzers (NY ex-Governor) attempt to hold certain       republican politicians responsible for the fallout, which is the implied       reason why Spitzer got taken down, *disappeared* as it were.       All of this has been established, the next step is to figure out WHY the       republicans did this and how it plays with the larger picture of whats been       going on in the long march to a police state.       Consider, 10% of the US populace is already in some sort of physical       incarceration and this current real estate debacle has reduced 10% more to a       financial prison and maybe 50% more are struggling under the strain.       Where is all this going?                     +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++       If you think this is a problem, the problem in the muni markets are       worse. Wait until they hit. They you'll be ducking for cover.       +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++              I won't, directly, because I'm not involved, but I get your point.       We're all in the same boat, and its sinking, and there's little any of us       can do except jump overboard, hideout, and tread water until another boat       comes along, if ever.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca