[continued from previous message]   
      
   >>> MMP: Many writers, artists, and musicians are not -- as I've found out to   
   my dismay.  They see it as a threat to their careers, as it can produce   
   fiction, poetry, artwork, and music for free and in a matter of seconds --   
   effectively replacing them.     
   Whereas I see it as a tool that I can use to create things (illu   
   trations/music) that will enhance the presentation of my poetry.  I've seen   
   some AI generated artwork that I is equal to (if not better than) the majority   
   of paintings I've seen in museums.    
    Artists (in all art forms including poetry) are going to have to up their   
   game if they're going to compete -- and that, IMHO, can only be a good thing   
   in the evolution of art.   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>   
   >> I’ve found Douchebag Willie doesn’t like anything that could possibly   
   outsmart a high school dropout.   
   >>   
   >> Right now, I’m told that Dreckster will start a hate campaign against   
   plankton shortly.   
   >>   
   >> (Yes, even plankton evolves!)   
   >   
   >   
   > You actually just seem to make it up as you go along, CujoDeSockpuppet.   
   >   
   > HTH and HAND.   
      
      
      
   Your 639th reuse of that line, Donkey, should serve as proof that, unlike   
   plankton, you are incapable of evolving.   
      
      
   This is a response to the post seen at:   
   http://www.jlaforums.com/viewtopic.php?p=699604738#699604738   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)