[continued from previous message]   
      
   Is "X" a new, more trustworthy source than the "trusted source" you'd used at   
   the time?   
      
   Could anyone possibly give a shit about what unnamed AI program you're using?   
      
      
   DUNCE: or commented on, any of NastyGoon's lines from any poems. Second, you   
   falsely claimed that I "trusted" X because I bought the book, when in fact I   
   bought the book because I did not trust X, and you know that because I'd told   
   you so.   
      
   MMP: You bought the book because, like any other 5-year-old, you wanted to be   
   able to say "I told you so."  If you hadn't trusted your "trusted source," you   
   wouldn't have spent the money on the book.   
      
   Like I said, you made a Dunce of yourself, again.   
      
      
   DUNCE: As for the third, I see you're discuss it at length, so I'll hold that   
   till the end.   
      
   As for the third, it has nothing to do with my statement.  Moving it to the   
   end is not going to confuse anyone regarding that (except, of course,   
   yourself).   
      
      
      
   >   
   > DUNCE: "Third, that's one of just two mistakes I've caught the AI I use   
   making - which gives it a much better record than both your Goon's AIs, and   
   both you and your Goon."   
   >   
   >   
   > MMP: What error are you claiming I made in the above?  Using an inferior AI   
   to your trusted source?  That's certainly not an error in my statement, in   
   which you claimed the supposed errors occurred ("You actually made three   
   errors there.").   
   >   
      
      
      
   GJDUNCE: Actually, it is a different kind of error -- and epistemic one -- to   
   try to dismiss a source as unreliable "crap" when it is more accurate than you   
   are.   
      
   MMP: Your source mistakenly attributed NancyGene's excellent line of poetry to   
   Whatshisname, and proceeded to make up a false quote from Whatshisname to back   
   it up.   
      
   In the end, you ended up shelling out a good chunk of money to purchase the   
   collected works of Whatshisname, just so you could say "Told you so!" to   
   NancyGene... only to discover that Whatshisname never wrote anything even   
   remotely resembling NancyGene's    
   poem, that your "trusted source" lied to you, and that you are the world's   
   biggest Dunce.   
      
      
   >   
   > MMP: As to your first two claims, you are basically just backing up what I'd   
   said: your AI wrongly attributed NancyGene's line to Whatshisname the Poet,   
   and you ended up buying the complete works of Whatshisname to verify a theft   
   that never occurred.   
   >   
      
      
      
   GJDUNCE: Now you're trying to defend your errors by doubling down on them. You   
   repeat the false claim that X "wrongly attributed NancyGene's line" when   
   yuu've already been told that X was never asked about NastyGoon's line; and   
   the false claim that I    
   trusted X when, in fact, I bought the book because I was not simply trusting   
   X. The first time you made those claims, I could call them errors because you   
   obviously don't remember the incident all that well; you can't even remember   
   the poet's name (   
   Robert Creeley). But when you double down on them, and go on to claim that I   
   somehow backed up either one, you've clearly crossed the line into lying.   
      
   MMP: There's no somehow about it, Dunce.   
      
   Let's review.  I said that:   
      
   1)  You consulted your "trusted source" regarding a line of poetry that I'd   
   posted by NancyGene.   
   2)  Your "trusted source" told you that it resembled a line by Whatshisname   
   the Poet.   
   3)  You couldn't find the complete works of Whatshisname the Poet online, and   
   couldn't provide the source (the original Whatshisname poem) that NancyGene   
   supposedly cribbed her line of poetry from.   
   4)  Because you couldn't miss an opportunity to say "Told you so!" to   
   NancyGene, you order the complete works of Whatshisname the Poet from Amazon...   
   5)  And found out that you were wrong, that NancyGene didn't copy her line   
   from Whatshisname, and that your "trusted source" lied to you.   
      
   Poor Dunce.   
      
   MMP: In short, you made a Dunce of yourself... again.   
      
      
   >   
   > DUNCE: Actually, "in short,"  you've made a Liar of yourself... again.   
   >   
      
      
      
   I have provided a step-by-step outline of the events, exactly as they went   
   down, above, DUNCE.  Which one are you claiming is a lie?   
      
   DUNCE: And that's sufficient to deal with you for now; I have more important   
   things to do than deal with lying trolls like HarryLiar.   
      
   [/quote]   
      
   MMP: IOW: Georgy Porgy runs away.   
      
   Again.   
      
      
   This is a response to the post seen at:   
   http://www.jlaforums.com/viewtopic.php?p=699604738#699604738   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)