Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.arts.poetry.comments    |    Feedback on eachothers poetry apparently    |    45,517 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 44,254 of 45,517    |
|    Cujo DeSockpuppet to NancyGene    |
|    Re: Re: THE HEADERS OF EVIDENCE - Cujo w    |
|    02 Jan 26 20:22:11    |
      From: cujo@petitmorte.net              nancygene.andjayme@gmail-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (NancyGene) wrote in       news:4lydnVHVDdMqvcX0nZ2dnZfqn_qdnZ2d@giganews.com:              >> George J. Dance wrote:       >>       >>> NancyGene wrote:       >>>       >>>> George J. Dance wrote:       >>>> I note that Mr. Fries's OP has been deleted.       >>>       >>>       >>> It never came through to JLA Forums, so was not deleted. JLA Forums       >>> has some strange rules about links and numbers.       >>>       >>       >>       >> Why do you lie so much, NastyGoon? Of course it came through; I       >> replied to it. Mr. Fries deleted it only after I'd replied.       >>       >>       >>>       >>> Cujo's pdf attachment in this thread, which shows the comparison       >>> headers, has not been deleted.       >>       >>       >> Mr. Fries analyzed the headers on my Davies post, and on a couple of       >> posts from different threads. He did not compare it to your alleged       >> Davies post; he admitted he didn't have the headers for that one, and       >> blamed his failure to find those on Will (as per his usual method).       >> Since his pdf is still in the thread, those reading the thread here       >> on JLA can see that for themselves.       >       >       >       > Cujo's original post on the subject was not on JLA Forums. Please       > prove that it was, George Dunce. Cujo explained why.              I really can't help their (JLAForums) draconian measures on external       posts. I did supply the URL for the original post to newsgrouper.org or       if that's too onerous, you can get a free Usenet account and a free       newsreader and get it from another server that does allow you to post       headers. You will see it there.              I didn't blame Douchebag Willie, I merely pointed out that he only       supplied one and that's how he chose to set boundary conditions. I did       not offer to find any because it would only be a guess.              All too often Dreckweasel has been vague and tries to change things. If       he doesn't want to offer specifics beyond that, I'm not going to try to       guess what that stupid fuck has in mind. Most likely just another tired       smokescreen, and that's his usual method because he's not just lazy, he's       blindingly moronic.              As you've seen, once Dreckery's whining about the headers of the posts       was shown to be wrong, he tried to change it to when it was added to the       website.              It's not my fault he's a dishonest, idiotic scumbag and a lying       hypocrite. Over the space of three different decades, Dreckweasel has       refused to supply headers. amazingly enough, they were supplied this       time.              I've explained my reasoning very carefully and welcomed questions.              If you have additional and specific questions, please submit them.              --       "Post-editing someone's statement before replying to it is a sure sign       that you have already lost the argument." - Little Willie Douchebag gets       another asskicking from Pendragon              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca