From: cujo@petitmorte.net   
      
   will.dockery@gmail-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (Will-Dockery) wrote in   
   news:Y4ecneSKcLbNkcT0nZ2dnZfqn_udnZ2d@giganews.com:   
      
   >> Cujo DeSockpuppet wrote:   
   >> Will Dockery  wrote in   
   >> news:1767409767-3274@newsgrouper.org:   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>>   
   >>> Cujo DeSockpuppet  posted:   
   >>> Will Dockery  wrote in   
   >>> news:1767400153-3274@newsgrouper.org:   
   >>> mpsilvertone@yahoo-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (HarryLime) posted:   
   >>> George J. Dance wrote:   
   >>> Cujo DeSockpuppet wrote:   
   >>> georgedance04@yahoo-dot-ca.no-spam.invalid (George J. Dance)   
   >>> wrote   
   >>>   
   >>> I've just looked and don't see April Magazine anywhere on PPB   
   >>> Do you have a link?   
   >>>   
   >>> Sure, I have two links (since there were two issues):   
   >>>   
   >>> April, volume 1 (2010):   
   >>> https://gdancesbetty.blogspot.com/2010/04/   
   >>>   
   >>> April, volume 2 (2011):   
   >>> https://gdancesbetty.blogspot.com/2011/04/   
   >>>   
   >>> Now that HarryLiar's dropped out of the discussion, Will, I   
   >>> hope we   
   >>> can move on to some of the other points in the OP which he's   
   >>> tried to bury. The most important one is his "advice" that I   
   >>> should take all of your poems off the blog.   
   >>>   
   >>> Not at all, in fact, I hope to contribute more poetry to PPB   
   >>> in 2026.   
   >>>   
   >>> Given you haven't donated anything but unspeakable sh*t so   
   >>> far, when do you plan to compose your first one, Douchebag?   
   >>>   
   >>> As if you've read any of it.   
   >>>   
   >>> It's a question of whether I can read all the way through his   
   >>> derivative, yet amazingly incoherent, nonsense.   
   >>> But I have tried. Indeed I have!   
   >>>   
   >>> I ask that you show some pity, Douchebag Willie has called me   
   >>> a "mailcious troll and cyberbully". I don't know how I can   
   >>> concentrate without those hurtful words breaking up my   
   >>> thoughts and concentration.   
   >>>   
   >>> In other words: "Curb your Douchebag, George!". And wipe up   
   >>> after. Thanks for your attention to this matter.   
   >>>   
   >>> I've tried to make some sense of this, but this is the best I   
   >>> can do:   
   >>>   
   >>> You've tried to read Will's poetry on the blog, but you've   
   >>> been unable to concentrate because you keep remembering   
   >>> comments he's made to you that hurt your feelings; so you've   
   >>> decided to call all of it "unspeakable sh*t." I hope that's   
   >>> an accurate summary.   
   >>>   
   >>> PSSST! George!   
   >>> It's satire!   
   >>> HTH!   
   >>>   
   >>> Effective satire often contains more than a grain of truth,   
   >>> Mr. Fries.   
   >>>   
   >>> Not always but your refusal to see the following as true kind   
   >>> of makes me question your objectiity and impartiality.   
   >>>   
   >>> Is the statement true?   
   >>> "Douchebag Willie has called me a "malicious troll and   
   >>> cyberbully"   
   >>>   
   >>> It's true that Will's called you that.   
   >>>   
   >>> Y/N? <- HAS HE EVER!!!!   
   >>>   
   >>> I'd say that's more than a grain given how often the baseless   
   >>> claim is made with no more than Drama queen shrieking. Perhaps   
   >>> it's Dreckery's bunched panties. If you're a friend, consider   
   >>> helping him unbunch them or at least fish a roomier set of   
   >>> panties from a Canuckistani dumpster and forward them on. 3XXL   
   >>> and up I'd guess for his fat ass.   
   >>>   
   >>> Also ask him to do something with his toofers!   
   >>>   
   >>> There's also more than a grain of truth that he's upset you for   
   >>> some reason. You wouldn't be frothing and flailing about like this   
   >>> otherwise.   
   >>   
   >>   
   >> Pointing that out is nothing to get defensive over; after all,   
   >> you wouldn't be the first to let one's personal acquaintance   
   >> with a poet get in the way of appreciating his poetry. Look,   
   >> for instance, at HarryLiar, who's popped up in this thread   
   >> again. Notice that he doesn't like Will's poetry, either, which   
   >> I'm sure he would claim has nothing to do with the fact that   
   >> Will has identified him (quite accurately) as one of the most   
   >> malicious trolls on Usenet.   
   >>   
   >> Pendragon a troll? And one of the most malicious ones too?   
   >>   
   >> Indeed; HarryLiar is one of the worst pieces of sh*t I've seen   
   >> here. But call him that, and you'll find him trashing your poetry,   
   >> too; and don't even think of him "publishing" you again.   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>>   
   >>>   
   >>> You're such a whiny, lying little shitbird, Dunce.   
   >>>   
   >>> You were banned from "AYoS" because you attacked the magazine, not   
   >>> because of anything you said about me.   
   >>>   
   >>> You falsely claimed that "AYoS" only published people that the   
   >>> editors were friends with -- which was blatantly untrue --   
   >>> especially since your poetry was still in our current print issue   
   >>> at that time.   
   >>>   
   >>> "AYoS" was started as a continuation of "The Sunday Sampler,"   
   >>> which was created to showcase the poetry of *each and every one*   
   >>> of AAPC's members who contributed; and we continue that practice   
   >>> today.   
   >>>   
   >>> And your recent false claims that "AYoS" steals poetry ensure that   
   >>> you're going to stay banned from that publication for the   
   >>> remainder of your miserable little life.   
   >>>   
   >>> Similarly, the Donkey and his Stink were not banned for anything   
   >>> they said about me, but because they continually interrupted "The   
   >>> Sunday Sampler" whenever Jim would "X" one of their poems.   
   >>>   
   >>> In short, when you make false accusations of unfair practices and   
   >>> literary theft, you're going to be banned from participating in   
   >>> it. I doubt that *any* publication would accept submissions from   
   >>> someone who made such charges against them.  And disrupting a   
   >>> magazine to the point that its editor closes it down, would get   
   >>> you banned from just about any magazine as well.   
   >>>   
   >>> I don't hold personal grudges over name-calling.  And even if I   
   >>> did, I wouldn't allow my personal grudges to carry over into my   
   >>> publication. I would have considered allowing him to participate   
   >>> in "AYoS" had several of the other contributors not objected   
   >>> (although his recent attempts to label "AYoS" as a vanity press   
   >>> have permanently closed the door on him   
   >>>   
   >>> Besides, the door seemed permanently closed years ago anyhow.   
   >>>   
   >>   
   >>   
   >> If so, it's because of your own actions. How many chances were you   
   >> given? More of your vague waffling, Douchebag. The big kids are   
   >> laughing at you.   
   >>   
   >> You f**ked up every one of them.   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>> That's no surprise, I wouldn't have expected you to lift the ban on   
   >>> me, anyhow.   
   >>>   
   >>> He'd get an earful from me after I gave you the chance to post to   
   >>> The Sunday Sampler and you ruined it   
   >>>   
   >>> More of your typical Bullsh*t of course, CujoDeSockpuppet.   
   >>>   
   >>> There was a problem (I forget what) and my response was justified.   
   >>>   
   >>   
   >>   
   >> > There was a problem, you and > that drunk. That you think it   
   >> > was justified   
   >>   
   >> I do remember that, yes.   
   >>   
   >> > But how can you claim there   
   >> > was a problem and say you   
   >> > don't recall?   
   >   
   >   
   >   
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)