From: cujo@petitmorte.net   
      
   will.dockery@gmail-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (Will-Dockery) wrote in   
   news:OpOcnX_68MPt9sT0nZ2dnZfqn_udnZ2d@giganews.com:   
      
   >> Cujo DeSockpuppet wrote:   
   >> Will Dockery  wrote in   
   >> news:1767448711-3274@newsgrouper.org:   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>>   
   >>> Cujo DeSockpuppet  posted:   
   >>>   
   >>> Will Dockery  wrote in   
   >>> news:1767447497-3274@newsgrouper.org:   
   >>>   
   >>>   
   >>> Cujo DeSockpuppet  posted:   
   >>> Will Dockery  wrote in   
   >>> news:1767400153-3274@newsgrouper.org:   
   >>> mpsilvertone@yahoo-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (HarryLime) posted:   
   >>> George J. Dance wrote:   
   >>> Cujo DeSockpuppet wrote:   
   >>> georgedance04@yahoo-dot-ca.no-spam.invalid (George J. Dance)   
   >>> wrote   
   >>>   
   >>> I've just looked and don't see April Magazine anywhere   
   >>> on PPB Do you have a link?   
   >>>   
   >>> Sure, I have two links (since there were two issues):   
   >>>   
   >>> April, volume 1 (2010):   
   >>> https://gdancesbetty.blogspot.com/2010/04/   
   >>>   
   >>> April, volume 2 (2011):   
   >>> https://gdancesbetty.blogspot.com/2011/04/   
   >>>   
   >>> Now that HarryLiar's dropped out of the discussion,   
   >>> Will, I hope we   
   >>> can move on to some of the other points in the OP which   
   >>> he's tried to bury. The most important one is his   
   >>> "advice" that I should take all of your poems off the   
   >>> blog.   
   >>>   
   >>> Not at all, in fact, I hope to contribute more poetry   
   >>> to PPB in 2026.   
   >>>   
   >>> I've tried to make some sense of this, but this is the   
   >>> best I can do:   
   >>>   
   >>> You've tried to read Will's poetry on the blog, but   
   >>> you've been unable to concentrate because you keep   
   >>> remembering comments he's made to you that hurt your   
   >>> feelings; so you've decided to call all of it   
   >>> "unspeakable sh*t." I hope that's an accurate summary.   
   >>>   
   >>> PSSST! George!   
   >>> It's satire!   
   >>> HTH!   
   >>>   
   >>> Effective satire often contains more than a grain of   
   >>> truth, Mr. Fries.   
   >>>   
   >>> Not always but your refusal to see the following as true   
   >>> kind of makes me question your objectiity and   
   >>> impartiality.   
   >>>   
   >>> Is the statement true?   
   >>> "Douchebag Willie has called me a "malicious troll and   
   >>> cyberbully"   
   >>>   
   >>> It's true that Will's called you that.   
   >>>   
   >>> Y/N? <- HAS HE EVER!!!!   
   >>>   
   >>> I'd say that's more than a grain given how often the   
   >>> baseless claim is made with no more than Drama queen   
   >>> shrieking. Perhaps it's Dreckery's bunched panties. If   
   >>> you're a friend, consider helping him unbunch them or at   
   >>> least fish a roomier set of panties from a Canuckistani   
   >>> dumpster and forward them on. 3XXL and up I'd guess for   
   >>> his fat ass.   
   >>>   
   >>> Also ask him to do something with his toofers!   
   >>>   
   >>> There's also more than a grain of truth that he's upset you   
   >>> for some reason. You wouldn't be frothing and flailing about   
   >>> like this otherwise.   
   >>   
   >>   
   >> Pointing that out is nothing to get defensive over; after   
   >> all, you wouldn't be the first to let one's personal   
   >> acquaintance with a poet get in the way of appreciating   
   >> his poetry. Look, for instance, at HarryLiar, who's   
   >> popped up in this thread again. Notice that he doesn't   
   >> like Will's poetry, either, which I'm sure he would claim   
   >> has nothing to do with the fact that Will has identified   
   >> him (quite accurately) as one of the most malicious   
   >> trolls on Usenet.   
   >>   
   >> Pendragon a troll? And one of the most malicious ones too?   
   >>   
   >> Indeed; HarryLiar is one of the worst pieces of sh*t I've   
   >> seen here. But call him that, and you'll find him trashing   
   >> your poetry, too; and don't even think of him "publishing"   
   >> you again.   
   >>   
   >>> You falsely claimed that "AYoS" only published people that   
   >>> the editors were friends with -- which was blatantly untrue   
   >>> -- especially since your poetry was still in our current   
   >>> print issue at that time.   
   >>>   
   >>> were not banned for anything   
   >>> they said about me, but because they continually interrupted   
   >>> "The Sunday Sampler" whenever Jim would "X" one of their   
   >>> poems.   
   >>>   
   >>> Again, as Zod accurately observed, Jim Senetto was a control freak   
   >>> on an ego trip with the SS.   
   >>>   
   >>> I'd been the one to make the decision to ban you.   
   >>>   
   >>> I don't remember you having the power to ban people from the S.S.   
   >>>   
   >>   
   >>   
   >> It was my week in charge, dummy. Of course it was my decision. Don't   
   >> forget, I made the decision to allow you there in the first place.   
      
   >> So guess who rescinded that decision, douchebag?   
      
   >> How fucking stupid are you?   
   >   
   > You had the power to ban people during that week?   
      
   I had the power to allow you to post to the Sunday Sampler and be   
   included. I also took that away after you tried to disrupt it.   
      
   Thanks for telling everyone just how stupid you are.   
      
   > Banned from what, a Usenet thread?   
      
   See above, douchebag.   
      
   --   
   "Post-editing someone's statement before replying to it is a sure sign   
   that you have already lost the argument." - Little Willie Douchebag gets   
   another asskicking from Pendragon   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)