From: cujo@petitmorte.net
will.dockery@gmail-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (Will-Dockery) wrote in
news:QOidnawoR7ynNsT0nZ2dnZfqnPudnZ2d@giganews.com:
>> HarryLime wrote:
>>
>>> Will-Dockery wrote:
>>>
>>>> Cujo DeSockpuppet wrote:
>>>> Will Dockery wrote in
>>>> news:1767448711-3274@newsgrouper.org:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Cujo DeSockpuppet posted:
>>>>>
>>>>> Will Dockery wrote in
>>>>> news:1767447497-3274@newsgrouper.org:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Cujo DeSockpuppet posted:
>>>>> Will Dockery wrote in
>>>>> news:1767400153-3274@newsgrouper.org:
>>>>> mpsilvertone@yahoo-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (HarryLime) posted:
>>>>> George J. Dance wrote:
>>>>> Cujo DeSockpuppet wrote:
>>>>> georgedance04@yahoo-dot-ca.no-spam.invalid (George J. Dance)
>>>>> wrote
>>>>>
>>>>> I've just looked and don't see April Magazine anywhere
>>>>> on PPB Do you have a link?
>>>>>
>>>>> Sure, I have two links (since there were two issues):
>>>>>
>>>>> April, volume 1 (2010):
>>>>> https://gdancesbetty.blogspot.com/2010/04/
>>>>>
>>>>> April, volume 2 (2011):
>>>>> https://gdancesbetty.blogspot.com/2011/04/
>>>>>
>>>>> Now that HarryLiar's dropped out of the discussion,
>>>>> Will, I hope we
>>>>> can move on to some of the other points in the OP which
>>>>> he's tried to bury. The most important one is his
>>>>> "advice" that I should take all of your poems off the
>>>>> blog.
>>>>>
>>>>> Not at all, in fact, I hope to contribute more poetry
>>>>> to PPB in 2026.
>>>>>
>>>>> I've tried to make some sense of this, but this is the
>>>>> best I can do:
>>>>>
>>>>> You've tried to read Will's poetry on the blog, but
>>>>> you've been unable to concentrate because you keep
>>>>> remembering comments he's made to you that hurt your
>>>>> feelings; so you've decided to call all of it
>>>>> "unspeakable sh*t." I hope that's an accurate summary.
>>>>>
>>>>> PSSST! George!
>>>>> It's satire!
>>>>> HTH!
>>>>>
>>>>> Effective satire often contains more than a grain of
>>>>> truth, Mr. Fries.
>>>>>
>>>>> Not always but your refusal to see the following as true
>>>>> kind of makes me question your objectiity and
>>>>> impartiality.
>>>>>
>>>>> Is the statement true?
>>>>> "Douchebag Willie has called me a "malicious troll and
>>>>> cyberbully"
>>>>>
>>>>> It's true that Will's called you that.
>>>>>
>>>>> Y/N? <- HAS HE EVER!!!!
>>>>>
>>>>> I'd say that's more than a grain given how often the
>>>>> baseless claim is made with no more than Drama queen
>>>>> shrieking. Perhaps it's Dreckery's bunched panties. If
>>>>> you're a friend, consider helping him unbunch them or at
>>>>> least fish a roomier set of panties from a Canuckistani
>>>>> dumpster and forward them on. 3XXL and up I'd guess for
>>>>> his fat ass.
>>>>>
>>>>> Also ask him to do something with his toofers!
>>>>>
>>>>> There's also more than a grain of truth that he's upset you
>>>>> for some reason. You wouldn't be frothing and flailing about
>>>>> like this otherwise.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Pointing that out is nothing to get defensive over; after
>>>> all, you wouldn't be the first to let one's personal
>>>> acquaintance with a poet get in the way of appreciating
>>>> his poetry. Look, for instance, at HarryLiar, who's
>>>> popped up in this thread again. Notice that he doesn't
>>>> like Will's poetry, either, which I'm sure he would claim
>>>> has nothing to do with the fact that Will has identified
>>>> him (quite accurately) as one of the most malicious
>>>> trolls on Usenet.
>>>>
>>>> Pendragon a troll? And one of the most malicious ones too?
>>>>
>>>> Indeed; HarryLiar is one of the worst pieces of sh*t I've
>>>> seen here. But call him that, and you'll find him trashing
>>>> your poetry, too; and don't even think of him "publishing"
>>>> you again.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> You falsely claimed that "AYoS" only published people that
>>>>> the editors were friends with -- which was blatantly untrue
>>>>> -- especially since your poetry was still in our current
>>>>> print issue at that time.
>>>>>
>>>>> were not banned for anything
>>>>> they said about me, but because they continually interrupted
>>>>> "The Sunday Sampler" whenever Jim would "X" one of their
>>>>> poems.
>>>>>
>>>>> Again, as Zod accurately observed, Jim Senetto was a control freak
>>>>> on an ego trip with the SS.
>>>>>
>>>>> I'd been the one to make the decision to ban you.
>>>>>
>>>>> I don't remember you having the power to ban people from the S.S.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> It was my week in charge
>>>
>>>
>>> You had the power to ban people during that week?
>>>
>>> Banned from what, a Usenet thread?
>>
>>
>>
>> You know damn well that The Sunday Sampler was a usenet magazine that
>> simply used a thread as its forum.
>>
>> And, you also know that it has since become both a webzine and a
>> print anthology.
>>
>> However humble its beginnings, its editors and (other) contributors
>> always treated it exactly as they would a professional publication.
>>
>> In treating it as one, it became one -- to us.
>>
>> And because we believed it to be a real publication, we invested the
>> time and effort in it to make it one.
>>
>> That's where you f**ked up.
>>
>> Because you considered it as nothing more than a usenet thread, you
>> (and your Stink) claimed that Jim was on "an ego trip" and refused to
>> follow the guidelines.
>>
>> Now The Sunday Sampler lives on in AYoS, and you are left out in the
>> cold.
>>
>> And so it goes.
>
>
>
> Okay, so you banned me, as was expected from the start, basically.
Who expected it, Douchebag? You? Given what a douchebag you have always
been, it's small wonder even a terminally stupid and genetically
challenged loser would expect just that.
When you were a child did the other kids not want you playing in their
sandbox too?
> I think I'll survive.
Please don't, Douchebag.
--
"Post-editing someone's statement before replying to it is a sure sign
that you have already lost the argument." - Little Willie Douchebag gets
another asskicking from Pendragon
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
