From: cujo@petitmorte.net   
      
   mpsilvertone@yahoo-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (HarryLime) wrote in   
   news:dhicnesYG-ujpv30nZ2dnZfqn_ednZ2d@giganews.com:   
      
   >> Will Dockery wrote:   
   >> nancygene.andjayme@gmail-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (NancyGene) posted:   
   >>   
   >>> HarryLime wrote:   
   >>> Will Dockery wrote:   
   >>> mpsilvertone@yahoo-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (HarryLime) posted:   
   >>> Will Dockery  wrote in   
   >>> news:1767754624-3274@newsgrouper.org:   
   >>> Cujo DeSockpuppet  posted:   
   >>> will.dockery@gmail-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (Will-Dockery) wrote in   
   >>> news:osOdnZl_Ae08Lc_0nZ2dnZfqnPWdnZ2d@giganews.com:   
   >>>   
   >>> Here's my living room, since you're so fascinated.   
   >>>   
   >>> (See attachment at JLA Forums)   
   >>>   
   >>> Given that you're a   
   >>>   
   >>> Again, that's a lie and a false statement.   
   >>>   
   >>> Why do you lie and misrepresent so much, CujoDeSockpuppet?   
   >>>   
   >>> Do you really want the facts thrown in your face from court   
   >>> records   
   >>>   
   >>> Threat of stalking here ^^^   
   >>>   
   >>> Again, threats of stalking by CujoDeSockpuppet are noted.   
   >>>   
   >>> Again, your threat to stalk me is noted.   
   >>>   
   >>> As CujoDeSockpuppet himself has defined "stalking."   
   >>>   
   >>> I deleted your lies and misrepresentations, yes, as always.   
   >>>   
   >>> I guess that means I have your permission. Thanks!   
   >>>   
   >>> I'm not giving permission to stalk me, my family and friends, no.   
   >>>   
   >>> Let's make that clear, stalkers.   
   >>>   
   >>>   
   >>> My permission to stalk me and my family?   
   >>>   
   >>> No, definitely not.   
   >>>   
   >>> For starters, you wouldn't be able to do that since there are no   
   >>> court records like that.   
   >>>   
   >>> Like what, exactly?   
   >>>   
   >>> What I was falsely accused of.   
   >>>   
   >>> The court records you stated that you were going to stalk.   
   >>>   
   >>> MMP: One doesn't stalk court records   
   >>>   
   >>> Malicious stalkers do, Pendragon.   
   >>>   
   >>> Per Merriam-Webster:   
   >>>   
   >>> stalking   
   >>> noun   
   >>> stalk·​ing   
   >>>   
   >>> 1 .  the act or crime of willfully and repeatedly following or   
   >>> harassing another person in circumstances that would cause a   
   >>> reasonable person to fear injury or death especially because of   
   >>> express or implied threats   
   >>>   
   >>> 2  .  broadly : a crime of engaging in a course of conduct directed   
   >>> at a person that serves no legitimate purpose and seriously alarms,   
   >>> annoys, or intimidates that person   
   >>>   
   >>> *****   
   >>>   
   >>> Note that in both definitions, the act is directed against a   
   >>> *person.*   
   >>>   
   >>> A court record is not a person.  Therefore a court record cannot be   
   >>> stalked.   
   >>>   
   >>   
   >>   
   >> Again, court records are found by stalking a person.   
   >>   
   >>   
   >   
   >   
   >   
   > Good Donkey.   
   >   
   > You said it correctly this time.   
   >   
   > Of course one can look up someone's court records for reasons other   
   > than stalking, but at least you're using the word correctly.   
      
   But if there are no court records, as Douchebag Willie claims, then how   
   can you stalk something that doesn't exist and for which there are no   
   provable actions?   
      
   Douchebags always fail at logic. Must be the inbreeding.   
      
   --   
   "The fact that it doesn't apply to the poem is of little consequence to   
   you, because your poems don't have a literary basis, because you're   
   functionally illiterate and haven't got a clue as to what a poem is." -   
   Little Willie Douchebag gets another asskicking from Pendragon   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)