From: user3274@newsgrouper.org.invalid
Cujo DeSockpuppet posted:
> HarryLime wrote:
>> Will Dockery wrote:
>>> mpsilvertone@yahoo-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (HarryLime) posted:
>>>> Will Dockery wrote in
> >>> news:1767754624-3274@newsgrouper.org:
> >>> Cujo DeSockpuppet posted:
> >>> will.dockery@gmail-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (Will-Dockery) wrote in
> >>> news:osOdnZl_Ae08Lc_0nZ2dnZfqnPWdnZ2d@giganews.com:
>
> >>> Here's my living room, since you're so fascinated.
> >>>
> >>> (See attachment at JLA Forums)
> >>>
> >>> Given that you're a xxxxxxxxxx xxxxx
False accusation by CujoDeSockpuppet here ^^^
> >>> Again, that's a lie and a false statement.
> >>>
> >>> Why do you lie and misrepresent so much, CujoDeSockpuppet?
> >>>
> >>> Do you really want the facts thrown in your face from court
> >>> records
Here ^^^
> >>> Threat of stalking here ^^^
> >>>
> >>> Again, threats of stalking by CujoDeSockpuppet are noted.
> >>>
> >>> Again, your threat to stalk me is noted.
> >>>
> >>> As CujoDeSockpuppet himself has defined "stalking."
> >>>
> >>> I deleted your lies and misrepresentations, yes, as always<
CujoDeSockpuppet.
> >>>
> >>> I guess that means I have your permission
For the record, absolutely not ^^^
> >>> I'm not giving permission to stalk me, my family and friends, no.
> >>>
> >>> Let's make that clear, stalkers.
Here ^^^
> >>> My permission to stalk me and my family?
>
> >>> No, definitely not.
Here ^^^
> >>> For starters, you wouldn't be able to do that since there are no
> >>> court records like that.
> >>>
> >>> Like what, exactly?
> >>>
> >>> What I was falsely accused of.
> >>> The court records you stated that you were going to stalk.
Stalk *through*.
> >>> MMP: One doesn't stalk court records
Stalk *through* court records, et cetera.
> >>> Malicious stalkers do, Pendragon.
Or in this case, threaten to.
> >>> Per Merriam-Webster:
> >>>
> >>> stalking
> >>> noun
> >>> stalk·âing
> >>>
> >>> 1 . the act or crime of willfully and repeatedly following or
> >>> harassing another person in circumstances that would cause a
> >>> reasonable person to fear injury or death especially because of
> >>> express or implied threats
Okay, not so much that since perhaps the Corey Connor Doo-Nanny incident.
😏
> >>> 2 . broadly : a crime of engaging in a course of conduct directed
> >>> at a person that serves no legitimate purpose and seriously alarms,
> >>> annoys, or intimidates that person
Exactly ^^^
> >>> *****
> >>>
> >>> Note that in both definitions, the act is directed against a
> >>> *person.*
Obviously.
In this case, °Will Dockery," jus friends and family.
> >>> A court record is not a person. Therefore a court record cannot be
> >>> stalked.
Court records can be *stalked through* by a malicious troll looking for
information on their target.
> >> Again, court records are found by stalking a person.
>
> > You said it correctly this time.
Okay, that's good.
> > Of course one can look up someone's court records for reasons other
> > than stalking, but at least you're using the word correctly.
There's no reason for a troll like NancyGene or CujoDeSockpuppet to search
court records on "Will Dockery" except for stalking me.
> But if there are no court records, as xxxxxxxxxx xxxxx claims, then how
> can you stalk something that doesn't exist and for which there are no
> provable actions?
The stalker types in "Will Dockery" in the search engine and gets no results.
Simple logic, CujoDeSockpuppet.
--
Poetry and songs of Will Dockery:
https://www.reverbnation.com/willdockery
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
