Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.arts.poetry.comments    |    Feedback on eachothers poetry apparently    |    45,517 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 44,391 of 45,517    |
|    Will Dockery to HarryLime    |
|    Re: Apple Montage / Will Dockery (1/2)    |
|    09 Jan 26 12:29:47    |
      From: user3274@newsgrouper.org.invalid              mpsilvertone@yahoo-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (HarryLime) wrote in       > news:y4KdnSjXE_5H3f30nZ2dnZfqn_adnZ2d@giganews.com:       > Will Dockery wrote:       >> mpsilvertone@yahoo-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (HarryLime) posted:       >>> Will Dockery wrote:       > >>> mpsilvertone@yahoo-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (HarryLime) posted:       > >>>> Will Dockery wrote:       >       > >>> Apple Montage       > >>>       > >>> Sneaking around       > >>> with Cousin Jenny,       > >>> smoking menthol       > >>> beyond the sheds.       > >>>       > >>> Late summer vacation 1973       > >>> in the backwoods of Tennessee.       > >>>       > >>> To the right       > >>> behind the barn       > >>> were apple trees.       > >>>       > >>> There were several       > >>> of those trees       > >>> and other trees       > >>> behind them       > >>> beyond a field       > >>> and behind them, other trees.       > >>>       > >>> Later, I stood near       > >>> as a crowd       > >>> watched Pops and my Uncle       > >>> cooking apple butter;       > >>> stirring the brown gunk,       > >>> boiling in a huge black kettle.       > >>>       > >>> I saw my father       > >>> secretly pass       > >>> a wine bottle       > >>> to my Uncle Clarence.       > >>>       > >>> I went from       > >>> breathing cold mist       > >>> out back behind the barn,       > >>> to breathing       > >>> the hot misty steam.       > >>>       > >>> The air smelled of apple fumes       > >>> and strong booze.       > >>>       > >>> -Will Dockery       > >>>       > >>> And here I thought you were going to ask if you could use my       > >>> de-cluttered version for your next Twitter poem.       > >>>       > >>> No, I wrote about the clutter in the thread, not the poem.       > >>>       > >>> The poem is an almost perfect poetry montage as it is..       > >>>       > >>> Here ^^^       > >>>       > >>> This is still obvious ^^^       > >>>       > >>> Define "poetry montage."       > >>>       > >>> See my poem "Apple Montage" for an example of ause of montage in       > >>> poetry.       > >>>       > >>> Here ^^^       > >>>       > >>> Wikipedia is a good start on defining "montage":              I agree, but remember, I'm applying montage effects to poetry.              > >>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Montage_(filmmaking)       > >>>       > >>> Here is Wikipedia's definition (as per your link):       > >>>       > >>> "A montage (/m'nËt'Ë'/ mon-TAHZH) is a film editing technique in       > >>> which a series of short shots are sequenced to condense space, time,       > >>> and information. Montages enable filmmakers to communicate a large       > >>> amount of information to an audience over a shorter span of time by       > >>> juxtaposing different shots, compressing time through editing, or       > >>> intertwining multiple storylines of a narrative.       > >>>       > >>> "The term has varied meanings depending on the filmmaking tradition.       > >>> In French, the word montage applied to cinema simply denotes       > >>> editing. In Soviet montage theory, as originally introduced outside       > >>> the USSR by Sergei Eisenstein,[1] it was used to create       > >>> symbolism.[2] Later, the term "montage sequence", used primarily by       > >>> British and American studios, became the common technique to suggest       > >>> the passage of time.[3]       > >>>       > >>> "From the 1930s to the 1950s, montage sequences often combined       > >>> numerous short shots with special optical effects (fades/dissolves,       > >>> split screens, double and triple exposures), dance, and music."              I used montage effects in my poem.              I wrote a poem.              I didn't make a film.              > >>> The closest your poem comes to having a montage would be a series of       > >>> lap dissolves showing the trees behind trees behind trees              Good find.              > >>> My poem definitely used montage, this is an argument that is       > >>> apparently ongoing.              I used montage effects in the poem, whether you agree or not.              > >>> This argument was settled long ago.       > >>>       > >>> Interesting that I was watching a television program about Orson       > >>> Welles just last night, where montage was mentioned.              I think it was a "Mad About You" rerun it was interesting, with some fairly       significant mentions of the montage effect.              > >>> Like it or not, my poem does use montage.       > >>>       > >>> You cannot point out *one* specific example of montage in your poem.       > >>>       > >>> The entire poem is montage, it uses montage effects.              The poem is based on montage effects.              They're there, you just choose to deny their existence.              > >>> I've known about montage since the 1970s.       > >>> My poem "Apple Montage" used montage effects in poetry.       > >>>       > >>> I know exactly what a montage is, and knew from the start.       > >>> My poem is an example of the use of montage effects in poetry.       > >>>       > >>> There are thousands of apples in the trees, in the montage.              Thus ^^^              > >>> the trees described are *apple* trees.              The setting and actions of the characters make that obvious to the reader, if       they're actually paying attention.              > >>> Is the title of your poem       > >>>       > >>> I think the title of montage poem is well known by now.       > >>>       > >>> It's a poem in montage form.              Here ^^^              > >>> I've explained to you how "Holiday Season" is a poem in montage       > >>> form              As I've explained "Apple Montage" numerous times, you just don't accept my       explanation.              > >>> Your poem is *not* in a similar form.              I've used montage effects in my poetry in a different way.       That's not so difficult to understand.              > >> There's no set form for a montage in poetry.              Meaning that various montage effects can and have been used in poetry.              > > You had said that "It's a poem in montage form."              That's correct.              I feel that montage effects can be used in several ways in poetry.              My use is obviously one of those.              > > Now you've corrected yourself, to say that there's "no       > > set form for a montage in poetry."              As far as I know, but as I think about it I think poets such as Allen Ginsberg       and Jack Kerouac can be found to use montage techniques in poetry.              I would need to find specific examples of that if course.              > > This is true, since "montage" is primarily used in film.              I used montage in poetry form.              > > Montage is based on the juxtaposition of images, whereas poetry is       > > created with words; so the language of the cinematic medium is rarely       > > transposed to the latter.              In my poem it was.              My poem is written in the form of a montage.              > > But as I've pointed out to you, the only portion of your poem which       > > could be said to function like a montage              The entire poem is a montage.              > > It is the least significant part of the poem -- and a bizarre choice       > > to use for a part of the title.              I don't agree, of course.              > > And, again, there are no apples in it.              The entire poem revolves around the apples.              That's why it's an apple montage.              > > The trees behind trees       > > could be apple trees              Which they were, which was why my father and uncle were cooking the apple       butter.              > > You used the title because you thought it was "snappy." You've said       > > so in the past.              I used the title because the poem uses montage effects, as I've explained       several times before.              > The fact that it doesn't apply to the poem              Except that it does apply to the poem, as I've explained several times before.              HTH and HAND.              --       Poetry and songs of Will Dockery:              [continued in next message]              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca