From: cujo@petitmorte.net
Will Dockery wrote in
news:1767963680-3274@newsgrouper.org:
>
> nancygene.andjayme@gmail-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (NancyGene) posted:
>
>> Will Dockery wrote:
>>> mpsilvertone@yahoo-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (HarryLime) posted:
>>>> Will Dockery wrote in
>>>> news:1767754624-3274@newsgrouper.org:
>>>>> Cujo DeSockpuppet posted:
>> >>>> will.dockery@gmail-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (Will-Dockery) wrote
>> >>>> in news:osOdnZl_Ae08Lc_0nZ2dnZfqnPWdnZ2d@giganews.com:
>>
>> >>>> Why do you lie and misrepresent so much, CujoDeSockpuppet?
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Do you really want the facts thrown in your face from court
>> >>>> records
>
> ^^^
>
>> >>>> Threat of stalking here ^^^
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Again, threats of stalking by CujoDeSockpuppet are noted.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Again, your threat to stalk me is noted.
>
> ^^^
>
>> >>>> As CujoDeSockpuppet himself has defined "stalking."
>> >>>>
>> >>>> I deleted your lies and misrepresentations, yes, as always.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> I guess that means I have your xxxxxxxxxx xxxxx xxxxx
>> >>>>
>> >>>> I'm not giving permission to stalk me, my family and friends,
>> >>>> no.
>
> ^^^
>
>> >>>> Let's make that clear, stalkers.
>
> ^^^
>
>> >>>> My permission to stalk me and my family?
>> >>>>
>> >>>> No, definitely not.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> For starters, you wouldn't be able to do that since there are no
>> >>>> court records like that.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Like what, exactly?
>> >>>>
>> >>>> What I was falsely accused of.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> The court records you stated that you were going to stalk.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> MMP: One doesn't stalk court records
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Malicious stalkers do, Pendragon.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Per Merriam-Webster:
>> >>>>
>> >>>> stalking
>> >>>> noun
>> >>>> stalk·ing
>> >>>>
>> >>>> 1 . the act or crime of willfully and repeatedly following or
>> >>>> harassing another person in circumstances that would cause a
>> >>>> reasonable person to fear injury or death especially because of
>> >>>> express or implied threats
>> >>>>
>> >>>> 2 . broadly : a crime of engaging in a course of conduct
>> >>>> directed at a person that serves no legitimate purpose and
>> >>>> seriously alarms, annoys, or intimidates that person
>> >>>>
>> >>>> *****
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Note that in both definitions, the act is directed against a
>> >>>> *person.*
>> >>>>
>> >>>> A court record is not a person. Therefore a court record cannot
>> >>>> be stalked.
>
> If course not.
>
>> >>> Again, court records are found by stalking a person.
>
> This ^^^
>
>> >> Of course one can look up someone's court records for reasons
>> >> other than stalking, but at least you're using the word correctly.
>
> I don't know any reason a malicious troll would look for such
> information unless they are stalking the person, trying to find
> negative information about them.
>
> NancyGene has made no secret of her stalking of me and others here
> over the years.
>
>> > There's no reason NancyGene or CujoDeSockpuppet would have to look
>> > up my court records except for stalking.
>>
>> How many court records do you have
>
> I don't know, I've never really looked.
Then how did you claim there weren't any to find, lying Douchebag?
How is inquiring about public records stalking, lying Douchebag?
--
"The fact that it doesn't apply to the poem is of little consequence to
you, because your poems don't have a literary basis, because you're
functionally illiterate and haven't got a clue as to what a poem is." -
Little Willie Douchebag gets another asskicking from Pendragon
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
