From: cujo@petitmorte.net   
      
   Will Dockery wrote in   
   news:1767969879-3274@newsgrouper.org:   
      
   >   
   > Cujo DeSockpuppet posted:   
   >> will.dockery@gmail-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (Will-Dockery) wrote in   
   >> news:QHSdnZ585MvTLP30nZ2dnZfqn_idnZ2d@giganews.com:   
   >>> mpsilvertone@yahoo-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (HarryLime) posted:   
   >>>> Will Dockery wrote in   
   >>>> news:1767754624-3274@newsgrouper.org:   
   >>>>> Cujo DeSockpuppet posted:   
   >>   
   >> >> >>>> Given that you're xxxxx xxxxx xxxxx   
   >> >> >>>>   
   >> >> >>>> Again, that's a lie and a false statement.   
   >   
   > Here ^^^   
   >   
   >> >> >>>> Why do you lie and misrepresent so much, CujoDeSockpuppet?   
   >> >> >>>>   
   >> >> >>>> Do you really want the facts thrown in your face from court   
   >> >> >>>> records   
   >   
   > Here ^^^   
   >   
   >> >> >>>> Threat of stalking here ^^^   
   >> >> >>>>   
   >> >> >>>> Again, threats of stalking by CujoDeSockpuppet are noted.   
   >> >> >>>>   
   >> >> >>>> Again, your threat to stalk me is noted.   
   >   
   > Here ^^^   
   >   
   >> >> >>>> As CujoDeSockpuppet himself has defined "stalking."   
   >> >> >>>>   
   >> >> >>>> I deleted your lies and misrepresentations, yes, as always.   
   >> >> >>>>   
   >> >> >>>> I guess that means I have your permission. Thanks!   
   >> >> >>>>   
   >> >> >>>> I'm not giving permission to stalk me, my family and friends,   
   >> >> >>>> no.   
   >> >> >>>>   
   >> >> >>>> Let's make that clear, stalkers.   
   >> >> >>>>   
   >> >> >>>> Permission to stalk me and my family?   
   >> >> >>>>   
   >> >> >>>> No, definitely not.   
   >   
   > Here ^^^   
   >   
   >> >> >>>> For starters, you wouldn't be able to do that since there are   
   >> >> >>>> no court records like that.   
   >> >> >>>>   
   >> >> >>>> What I was falsely accused of.   
   >> >> >>>>   
   >> >> >>>> The court records you stated that you were going to stalk.   
   >> >> >>>>   
   >> >> >>>> MMP: One doesn't stalk court records   
   >> >> >>>>   
   >> >> >>>> Malicious stalkers do, Pendragon.   
   >> >> >>>>   
   >> >> >>>> Per Merriam-Webster:   
   >> >> >>>>   
   >> >> >>>> stalking   
   >> >> >>>> noun   
   >> >> >>>> stalk÷âÂÂing   
   >> >> >>>>   
   >> >> >>>> 1 . the act or crime of willfully and repeatedly following   
   >> >> >>>> or harassing another person in circumstances that would cause   
   >> >> >>>> a reasonable person to fear injury or death especially   
   >> >> >>>> because of express or implied threats   
   >> >> >>>>   
   >> >> >>>> 2 . broadly : a crime of engaging in a course of conduct   
   >> >> >>>> directed at a person that serves no legitimate purpose and   
   >> >> >>>> seriously alarms, annoys, or intimidates that person   
   >> >> >>>>   
   >> >> >>>> *****   
   >> >> >>>>   
   >> >> >>>> Note that in both definitions, the act is directed against a   
   >> >> >>>> *person.*   
   >> >> >>>>   
   >> >> >>>> A court record is not a person. Therefore a court record   
   >> >> >>>> cannot be stalked.   
   >> >> >>>>   
   >> >> >>> Again, court records are found by stalking a person.   
   >   
   > ^^^   
      
   Adding carets to your lie doesn't make it true, Douchebag!   
      
   >> >> >> Of course one can look up someone's court records for reasons   
   >> >> >> other than stalking, but at least you're using the word   
   >> >> >> correctly.   
   >> >> >   
   >> >> > There's no reason NancyGene or CujoDeSockpuppet would have to   
   >> >> > look up my court records except for stalking.   
   >   
   > ^^^   
      
   Adding carets to your lie doesn't make it true, Douchebag!   
      
      
   >> >> But you claimed you didn't have any court records, Douchebag!   
   >   
   > None that would support your lying and false statements and   
   > accusations, Kevin Fries.   
   >   
   >> > Even if I did, why would they be your business, stalker?   
   >>   
   >> To prove you're a liar   
   >   
   > So when you find out otherwise, you'll put an apology to me here,   
   > Kevin Fries?   
      
   Sure, right after you apologize to me for breaking your word about   
   snipping, you lying scumbag.   
      
   --   
   "The fact that it doesn't apply to the poem is of little consequence to   
   you, because your poems don't have a literary basis, because you're   
   functionally illiterate and haven't got a clue as to what a poem is." -   
   Little Willie Douchebag gets another asskicking from Pendragon   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   
|