From: cujo@petitmorte.net   
      
   Will Dockery  wrote in   
   news:1767986587-3274@newsgrouper.org:   
      
   >   
   > Cujo DeSockpuppet  posted:   
   >> Will Dockery wrote:   
   >>> mpsilvertone@yahoo-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (HarryLime) posted:   
   >>>> Will Dockery  wrote in   
   >>>> news:1767754624-3274@newsgrouper.org:   
   >>>>> Cujo DeSockpuppet  posted:   
   >>>>>> will.dockery@gmail-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (Will-Dockery) wrote   
   >>>>>> in news:osOdnZl_Ae08Lc_0nZ2dnZfqnPWdnZ2d@giganews.com:   
   >>   
   >> >> >> >>>> Why do you lie and misrepresent so much, CujoDeSockpuppet?   
   >> >> >> >>>>   
   >> >> >> >>>> Do you really want the facts thrown in your face from   
   >> >> >> >>>> court records   
   >> >   
   >> > Threat of stalking here ^^^   
   >> >   
   >> >> >> >>>> Again, threats of stalking by CujoDeSockpuppet are noted.   
   >> >> >> >>>>   
   >> >> >> >>>> Again, your threat to stalk me is noted.   
   >> >   
   >> > ^^^   
   >> >   
   >> >> >> >>>> As CujoDeSockpuppet himself has defined "stalking."   
   >> >> >> >>>>   
   >> >> >> >>>> I deleted your lies and misrepresentations, yes, as   
   >> >> >> >>>> always.   
   >> >> >> >>>>   
   >> >> >> >>>> I guess that means I have your xxxxxxxxxx xxxxx xxxxx   
   >> >> >> >>>>   
   >> >> >> >>>> I'm not giving permission to stalk me, my family and   
   >> >> >> >>>> friends, no.   
   >> >   
   >> > ^^^   
   >> >   
   >> >> >> >>>> Let's make that clear, stalkers.   
   >> >   
   >> > ^^^   
   >> >   
   >> >> >> >>>> Permission to stalk me and my family?   
   >> >> >> >>>>   
   >> >> >> >>>> No, definitely not.   
   >> >> >> >>>>   
   >> >> >> >>>> For starters, you wouldn't be able to do that since there   
   >> >> >> >>>> are no court records like that.   
   >> >> >> >>>>   
   >> >> >> >>>> Like what, exactly?   
   >> >> >> >>>>   
   >> >> >> >>>> What I was falsely accused of.   
   >> >> >> >>>>   
   >> >> >> >>>> The court records you stated that you were going to stalk.   
   >> >> >> >>>>   
   >> >> >> >>>> MMP: One doesn't stalk court records   
   >> >> >> >>>>   
   >> >> >> >>>> Malicious stalkers do, Pendragon.   
   >> >> >> >>>>   
   >> >> >> >>>> Per Merriam-Webster:   
   >> >> >> >>>>   
   >> >> >> >>>> stalking   
   >> >> >> >>>> noun   
   >> >> >> >>>> stalk·​ing   
   >> >> >> >>>>   
   >> >> >> >>>> 1 .  the act or crime of willfully and repeatedly   
   >> >> >> >>>> following or harassing another person in circumstances   
   >> >> >> >>>> that would cause a reasonable person to fear injury or   
   >> >> >> >>>> death especially because of express or implied threats   
   >> >> >> >>>>   
   >> >> >> >>>> 2  .  broadly : a crime of engaging in a course of conduct   
   >> >> >> >>>> directed at a person that serves no legitimate purpose and   
   >> >> >> >>>> seriously alarms, annoys, or intimidates that person   
   >> >> >> >>>>   
   >> >> >> >>>> *****   
   >> >> >> >>>>   
   >> >> >> >>>> Note that in both definitions, the act is directed against   
   >> >> >> >>>> a *person.*   
   >> >> >> >>>>   
   >> >> >> >>>> A court record is not a person.  Therefore a court record   
   >> >> >> >>>> cannot be stalked.   
   >> >> >   
   >> >> > If course not.   
   >> >> >   
   >> >> >> >>> Again, court records are found by stalking a person.   
   >> >> >   
   >> >> > This ^^^   
   >> >> >   
   >> >> >> >> Of course one can look up someone's court records for   
   >> >> >> >> reasons other than stalking, but at least you're using the   
   >> >> >> >> word correctly.   
   >> >> >   
   >> >> > I don't know any reason a malicious troll would look for such   
   >> >> > information unless they are stalking the person, trying to find   
   >> >> > negative information about them.   
   >> >> >   
   >> >> > NancyGene has made no secret of her stalking of me and others   
   >> >> > here over the years.   
   >> >   
   >> > For instance, NG's stalking of Stephan Pickering, Vinyl Cat and   
   >> > Zod, to name three.   
   >> >   
   >> >> >> > There's no reason NancyGene or CujoDeSockpuppet would have to   
   >> >> >> > look up my court records except for stalking.   
   >> >> >>   
   >> >> >> How many court records do you have   
   >> >   
   >> > Stalker type question noted ^^^   
   >> >   
   >> >> > I don't know, I've never really looked.   
   >> >>   
   >> >> Then how did you claim there weren't any to find   
   >> >   
   >> > Because you were making false statements and accusations about me,   
   >> > fur starters, Kevin.   
   >> >   
   >> >> How is inquiring about public records stalking   
   >> >   
   >> > If I did the same about "Kevin Fries" you wouldn't say I was   
   >> > stalking?   
   >>   
   >> You already have, you lying Douchebag. After I proved it, you started   
   >> claiming everyone else was stalking you to hide that you were caught   
   >> stalking.   
   >   
   > That's not really true.   
      
   You're a proven liar.   
      
   > I haven't searched any personal or court records for "Kevin Fries."   
      
   You're a proven liar.   
      
   --   
   "The fact that it doesn't apply to the poem is of little consequence to   
   you, because your poems don't have a literary basis, because you're   
   functionally illiterate and haven't got a clue as to what a poem is." -   
   Little Willie Douchebag gets another asskicking from Pendragon   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)