From: cujo@petitmorte.net   
      
   nancygene.andjayme@gmail-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (NancyGene) wrote in   
   news:elKdnWHneKgjZRT0nZ2dnZfqn_idnZ2d@giganews.com:   
      
   >> NancyGene wrote:   
   >>   
   >>> HarryLime wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>> Will Dockery wrote:   
   >>>> mpsilvertone@yahoo-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (HarryLime) posted:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>> Will-Dockery wrote:   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> Kevin Fries, here's the authentic screenshot of the introduction   
   >>>>> to Pegasus 1976 by Ahmos Zu-Bolton.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> Dockery: It is real, send it to Miller and Zu-Bolton"s and find   
   >>>>> out for yourself.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> Here's the proof.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> (See attachment at JLA Forums.)   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> Dockery: The Ahmos Zu-Bolton proof, again.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> 1976 Poet-In-Residence at Carver High School, Columbus Georgia.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> (See JLA Forums attachment)   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> doesn't say "Poet-In-Residence at Carver High School, Columbus   
   >>>>> Georgia."   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>> DONKEY: The introduction is from the Carver High School literary   
   >>>> journal Pegasus, 1976 edition.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> You might as well give up, Pendragon, my evidence is solid.   
   >>>>   
   >>>   
   >>>   
   >>> MMP: The introduction (if real) was obviously dictated over the   
   >>> phone, or transcribed from a handwritten letter, as Zu-Bolton   
   >>> neglected to sign it.   
   >>>   
   >>> As such, the title, "Poet-In-Residence," would not necessarily refer   
   >>> to Carver High.   
   >>>   
   >>> The introduction is *not* evidence.  It is not signed.  You have   
   >>> failed to show that it is actually in the school magazine.   
   >>>   
   >>> As per George Dunce's research, he was employed as a   
   >>> "Poet-In-Residence" at Howard University at the time.  The title   
   >>> most likely refers to his position there.   
   >>>   
   >>> His absence from the Carver High yearbook shows that he was *not* a   
   >>> member of the Carver High faculty, and therefore could not have been   
   >>> their "Poet-In-Residence" (as "Poet-In-Residence," by definition,   
   >>> means that he is a member of the faculty).   
   >>>   
   >>> Dunce has proposed that he dropped in on some classes in Carver High   
   >>> as part of the "Visiting Poet" program he was affiliated with.  And   
   >>> while I hate to agree with anything Dunce says, his theory is the   
   >>> best-supported, and most likely one.   
   >>>   
   >>> You simply made a mistake when you assumed that the title under his   
   >>> name referred to a non-existent position at Carver High (when it   
   >>> referred to his actual position at Howard U.).   
   >>>   
   >>> I don't see what is so difficult for you to grasp (other than your   
   >>> mulish stubbornness that refuses to admit that you were wrong).   
   >>>   
   >>> Here, again, are the facts:   
   >>>   
   >>> Zu-Bolton was employed as "Poet-In-Residence" at Howard University   
   >>> in the spring of 1976.   
   >>>   
   >>> Zu-Bolton does not appear among the Faculty in the Carver High   
   >>> yearbook of 1976 (which means that he wasn't employed there).   
   >>>   
   >>> Zu-Bolton was part of a "Visiting Poet" program in the spring of   
   >>> 1976, and as such, he visited schools with a large African-American   
   >>> student body, sat in on their classes, encouraged them to write,   
   >>> etc.   
   >>>   
   >>> Conclusion: Zu-Bolton probably visited Carver High in the spring of   
   >>> 1976 as part of the Visiting Poet program.  He was not the   
   >>> "Poet-In-Residence" at Carver High, because he was not   
   >>> "In-Residence" (employed) there.   
   >>>   
   >>> As to whether Barfly and/or you were friends with him, we have only   
   >>> your word on that -- and you have been caught lying numerous times,   
   >>> and post-edit everyone's comments in order to deceitfully provide   
   >>> false and misleading responses.  In short, you have proven yourself   
   >>> untrustworthy, and your word has no value to anyone other than your   
   >>> socks.   
   >>   
   >>   
   >> With the wider view of the Pegasus thing, we see that it is NOT   
   >> stapled but seems to be a loose-leaf style pamphlet, suitable for   
   >> inserting a fraudulent document into.  The paper that is directly   
   >> underneath the "cover," which is the same color as the cover, seems   
   >> to be the back cover and is obviously NOT attached to the "cover."   
   >> The larger orange paper underneath the "back cover" is, well, LARGER   
   >> than the cover and back cover, and is not the same color as the   
   >> Zu-Bolton "proof."  How many different color papers did the dumbass   
   >> kids use for this "publication?"  Or, did Will Dockery shuffle papers   
   >> and insert new ones?   
   >   
   >   
   >   
   > If the pages were stapled together, why are they separate in the   
   > photo?   
      
   This is why Douchebag Willie is a proven liar.   
      
   --   
   "The fact that it doesn't apply to the poem is of little consequence to   
   you, because your poems don't have a literary basis, because you're   
   functionally illiterate and haven't got a clue as to what a poem is." -   
   Little Willie Douchebag gets another asskicking from Pendragon   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)