From: cujo@petitmorte.net
Will Dockery wrote in news:1771526947-
3274@newsgrouper.org:
>
> Cujo DeSockpuppet posted:
>> Will Dockery wrote in
>> news:1771463343-3274@newsgrouper.org:
>>> Cujo DeSockpuppet posted:
>>>> Will Dockery wrote:
>>
>> >> >> >> No thanks, not worth the trouble, besides, NancyGene is
>> >> >> >> probably just trolling again, as you pointed out, Kevin.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> And so it goes.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> Kevin stated that NancyGene was trolling me.
>> >> >> >>
>>
>> Look at all the information
>
> It was the lies and misrepresentations I removed, leaving the truth:
Really?
Let's peruse what I actualy said rather than accept the word of a proven
and repeat liar!
Here's the first!
1. "Tonight's philosophical question: Can a Douchebag have a spine?"
What lies and misrepresentations exist in that statment, Douchebag?
Or did you lie again?
2. "It's an observation. It flows logically from my original statement
about you lacking a spine, which you lied about in your latest tizzy,
Douchebag."
I offered a question which you avoided and continued with my observation.
Where are the lies and misrepresentations, Douchebag?
3. I continue to expand and expount upon my previous words:
"Let's lay out the logic: If a Douchebag can never have a spine, it
would take a pretty stupid Donkey to believe it. Fortunately, we have
you and you're way overqualifed in the stupid Donkey department.
Serendipity."
Gee, more logical inferences. Where are the lies and misrepresentations,
Douchebag?
Do you ever stop lying?
4. I even wished Douchebag willie much happiness with their tizzy.
"Have a happy tizzy, Dreckweasel!"
Where are the lies and misrepresentations, Douchebag?
5. So let's allow you to retort. Gee, you failed again.
Dreckster: "With no basis in reality, of course."
"Agreed, Douchebag! Your tizzies never do have a basis in reality. After
all, you are delusional and deny reality by lying here over and over."
I actually agreed with you.
Where are the lies and misrepresentations, Douchebag?
Here's the full exchange, Douchebag:
>> >> >> Tonight's philosophical question: Can a Douchebag have a spine?
>> > Attempted deflection from Kevin Fries, noted and removed.
>>
>> It's an observation. It flows logically from my original statement
>> about you lacking a spine, which you lied about in your latest tizzy,
>> Douchebag.
>> Let's lay out the logic: If a Douchebag can never have a spine, it
>> would take a pretty stupid Donkey to believe it. Fortunately, we have
>> you and you're way overqualifed in the stupid Donkey department.
>> Serendipity.
>> Have a happy tizzy, Dreckweasel!
>
> With no basis in reality, of course.
Agreed, Douchebag! Your tizzies never do have a basis in reality. After
all, you are delusional and deny reality by lying here over and over.
******************************
Whine more, Dreckweasel.
> You admitted NG is a troll, Kevin Fries.
We've already been through that particular lie and misrepresentation
several times over, Douchebag.
Why are you so fucking stupid?
--
"The fact that it doesn't apply to the poem is of little consequence to
you, because your poems don't have a literary basis, because you're
functionally illiterate and haven't got a clue as to what a poem is." -
Little Willie Douchebag gets another asskicking from Pendragon
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
