Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.arts.poetry.comments    |    Feedback on eachothers poetry apparently    |    45,517 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 45,480 of 45,517    |
|    Cujo DeSockpuppet to NancyGene    |
|    Re: Dorothy Livesay -- Mathematics    |
|    23 Feb 26 23:18:30    |
      From: cujo@petitmorte.net              nancygene.andjayme@gmail-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (NancyGene) wrote in       news:q4udnawRZomcVAH0nZ2dnZfqn_qdnZ2d@giganews.com:              >> HarryLime wrote:       >>       >>> Will-Dockery wrote:       >>>       >>>> HarryLime wrote:       >>>>       >>>>> Will Dockery wrote:       >>>>> mpsilvertone@yahoo-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (HarryLime) posted:       >>>>>       >>>>>> Will Dockery wrote:       >>>>>> HarryLime wrote:       >>>>>> NancyGene wrote:       >>>>>> David Dalton wrote:       >>>>>>       >>>>>> Here’s a poem by Dorothy Livesay       >>>>>>       >>>>>> -------       >>>>>>       >>>>>> How do you interpret that? I guess there are       >>>>>> many complex mth roots of 1=2*n*pi, n=0,1,2...       >>>>>> Also I guess the heart could be a cardioid. :-)       >>>>>>       >>>>>> In the above poem some multiple spaces will       >>>>>> have been converted to a single space by my       >>>>>> newsreader Hogwasher, which does not       >>>>>> allow posting of multiple spaces (or spaces       >>>>>> at the start of a line) or of multiple blank lines.       >>>>>>       >>>>>> Searching for actual mathematical equations regarding the root of       >>>>>> one, might be over thinking it a bit.       >>>>>>       >>>>>> Its message is more elementary than that; she's applying       >>>>>> mathematical formulas to sexual patterns:       >>>>>>       >>>>>> Much talk... no bed. Or, MT>B. B=0.       >>>>>>       >>>>>> Some talk... some bed. Or, ST=B. B=ST.       >>>>>>       >>>>>> No talk... all bed; and talk tomorrow. Or, NT>>>>>       >>>>>> IOW: The speaker is recognizing patterns in her mate's sexual       >>>>>> behavior which she sarcastically refers to as "the great game."       >>>>>>       >>>>>> Recognizing the patterns reduces sex to a "game" -- a       >>>>>> predetermined set of movements that one goes through by rote.       >>>>>>       >>>>>> This, in turn, reduces the speaker's desire.       >>>>>>       >>>>>> She says that she meant to "hold your bones deep to the root of       >>>>>> one." This passage is full of sexual overtones (winking       >>>>>> references to penile erection and deep penetration), reflecting       >>>>>> the wild, uncontrolled passion she had felt.       >>>>>>       >>>>>> Unfortunately, her recognition of their behavioral "formulas"       >>>>>> regarding sex has put her out of the mood. B=0.       >>>>>>       >>>>>> It's clever, but emotionally flat.       >>>>>>       >>>>>> The poem is also not in the public domain in the US or Canada.       >>>>>> Ms. Livesay died in 1996, so that is not: "General Rule       >>>>>> (Post-2022): Death of author + 70 years."       >>>>>>       >>>>>> David Dalton, please do not commit copyright infringement.       >>>>>>       >>>>>> Perhaps David is unaware of the recent changes in Canadian       >>>>>> Copyright law.       >>>>>>       >>>>>> perhaps you are also:       >>>>>>       >>>>>> As far as I know I mostly up to date, as George Dsnce and I have       >>>>>> discovered the changing laws in Canada here several times over       >>>>>> the years.       >>>>>>       >>>>>> "Before December 30, 2022, the general copyright term in Canada       >>>>>> was the life of the author plus 50 years (ending on December 31       >>>>>> of that 50th year). This standard applied to most literary,       >>>>>> dramatic, musical, and artistic works. Works already in the       >>>>>> public domain as of December 31, 2021, remained free." (From       >>>>>> George Dance's favorite source.)       >>>>>>       >>>>>> Ms. Livesay died in 1996. David Dalton should be able to do the       >>>>>> math.       >>>>>>       >>>>>       >>>>>       >>>>> [...]       >>>>>       >>>>>       >>>>>> I'd mentioned in the past that my earliest extant poem dates from       >>>>>> around the time I was 16.       >>>>>>       >>>>>> I'm not far behind you, then       >>>>>>       >>>>>> I did recently find some old comic strips I drew back around       >>>>>> 1969.       >>>>>>       >>>>>> You would have been 10/11 years old in 1969.       >>>>>>       >>>>>       >>>>>       >>>>> Again, that's correct.       >>>>>       >>>>>       >>>>       >>>>       >>>>       >>>> No sh*t       >>>       >>>       >>> I was drawing comix in 1969, not really writing poetry quite yet.       >>>       >>> HTH and HAND.       >>       >>       >> You should have displayed it on your mother's refrigerator for a       >> week, then tossed it.       >       >       >       > Will Donkey is not able to grasp the fact that he does not do these       > things well.              He doesn't lie to his betters very well either!1!              --       "The fact that it doesn't apply to the poem is of little consequence to       you, because your poems don't have a literary basis, because you're       functionally illiterate and haven't got a clue as to what a poem is." -       Little Willie Douchebag gets another asskicking from Pendragon              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca